Legal Question in Criminal Law in India

The dispute was happend between 3 brothers & nephews due to some property(farms) issue in 1999.

opposite party has logged the cases on his eldest brother & nephews under act 323,324,504,506,307,436(fire) & 25A.

We have also logged the FIR on opposition party under act 323,324,504,506. At the time of dispute one person of our party was below 18yrs( 17.6 yrs).

No verbal evidence was performed before the court from any side.Dstrict court has punished us by imprisionment under these diffierent cases ( max 5yrs under act 307 ) in Nov'2010 & they are completely free by the court.Now we are on bell from high court . Now we are searching the possible ways to skip the imprisionment avoiding to continue the case in high court.

Somebody had suggest on this portal that if the opposite party presents before the district judge and tell the statements in our favoure such as he is now compromised with us & wants to free us from court punishment & will withdraw all the cases against us. Then court will suspend all the sentences against us. But enquiring the same to the local lawyers they have told that there is no such type of rulings in constitution.

Can anyone tell me under which rulings of constitution this is possible & whats are other possible ways to skip imprisionment.

1 Answer from Attorneys

Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in India

Looking for something else?