Legal Question in Criminal Law in India

Actually due to my mistake I could not disclose full facts on my last question. After taking cognizance on my criminal complaint court summoned to accused u/s 406/420/468/471/506
Photocopy of disputed document is subbmited by I.O. with ATR of police in court. Said documents was given to I.O. by accused.
( accused allegation is against me that sign is faked by me and I done my sign in the presence of 2 wittness, cross criminal complaint are also filed by accused in his case court issued summons against me u/s 406/420) I know very well that everyones thumb impression,eye retina and handwritig and sign is unique and noone can,t deny his signature
(I am not suceed to take back property from accused due to this I am preparing to file a suit for recovery from collection money for my civil ca
Accused threatened me that If I will do all the records destroye from transport authority then what will you have remain,this threat I complained in court, Disputed documents are placed in govt. office,photocopy of disputed documents are placed in my case file,Next date of hearing is after 2 months at this stage without waiting 2 months Can I move application for summoning original documents and for seizing and sealing them u/s 91 criminal procedure code to direc production of disputed document ?where photocopy of disputed documents is already placed in my case file.

Asked on 8/31/10, 3:36 am

waquar ahmed Ahmed & Associates;

0 users found helpful

0 attorneys agreed

YA U SHOULD PROCEED FURTHER UNLESS ORIGINAL DOCUMENT PRODUCE THE PHOTOCOPY CAN'T BE READ IN EVIDENCE.

Answered on 8/31/10, 5:49 am

Keywords

Match Any Match All

Country

State

Area of Law