Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
this about previous statement. a previous statement is NOT disowned by the witness. it is marked as an deffence exhibit. is it necessary to bring the contridictions to his notice during cross examination?/or is it enough to highlight the omissions and contridictions at the tme of arguement//
Asked on 10/08/11, 7:50 pm
2 Answers from Attorneys
Shrichand Nahar
S.V.Nahar, Advocate
Unless a witness is confronted with contradictions and material omissions, same is not useful either as evidence or during arguments.
Answered on 10/08/11, 10:32 pm
Aniruddha Pawse
Aniruddha.P.Pawse Advocates
it is necessary to contradict witness in cross examination and then to highlight the omissions and contadictions at the time of argument.
Answered on 10/08/11, 10:59 pm
Related Questions & Answers
-
1) can police areest a person under attrocity act 3(1)-10 without verifying the... Asked 10/08/11, 10:02 am in India Criminal Law
-
If genius paper according to Crpc 294 admitted fact den-aye what effect Asked 10/08/11, 9:24 am in India Criminal Law
-
If the dissolution deed(retirement deed) of a registered partnership firm(under the... Asked 10/08/11, 7:41 am in India Criminal Law
-
What is the scope of revision under section 397 of CrPC in session court? Asked 10/08/11, 6:28 am in India Criminal Law
-
What are the remedies available to me if my bail has been cancelled by trial court Asked 10/07/11, 11:16 pm in India Criminal Law
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
