Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
sec 138 N I Act
Assistant Manager of the compnay filed complaint u/s 138 of n i act without filing authority and board resolution ofthe company. he is holder in due course or not ? after 3 years he is filing board resolution
5 Answers from Attorneys
Re: sec 138 N I Act
you should have objected when the person filed the resolution. now he has rectified his mistake. rest can be commented after seeing the file.
Re: sec 138 N I Act
There is nothing illegal in it. No advantage to you.
Re: sec 138 N I Act
It is company to whom manager is representing.Filing of resolution after 3 years does not effect their case u/s.138 N.I.Act.
Re: sec 138 N I Act
permission can be granted anytime
its ok if its before evidence even after evidence its not relevant issue
in only certain circumstances you can raise this objection but for that case has to be studied
Re: sec 138 N I Act
Production of the Board resolution even after 3 years will not make any difference on the merits of the case.
Related Questions & Answers
-
CrPC Why do we call CrPC criminal procedure code, rather than act? Asked 7/31/07, 6:00 am in India Criminal Law
-
Bankers indemnity policy claim Is a claim settlled if the banker files an FIR on an... Asked 7/23/07, 11:02 am in India Criminal Law
-
Compensation in a murder case court can punished to accused after conviction as jail... Asked 7/23/07, 10:23 am in India Criminal Law
-
Q on IPC 403, 408 & 420. I live in UK. I have a private complaint case pending... Asked 7/22/07, 10:45 pm in India Criminal Law
-
Claim in a murder case court can punished to accused but can complainant claim... Asked 7/22/07, 4:27 am in India Criminal Law
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
