Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
Time Bar Indeminity bond
i had indeminified my son for a loan taken by him from his friend, and my son had issued a post dated cheque.The cheque bounced, and my son is not able to prove that he has repaid, because he repaid in cash without reciept on good faith ( 1 lac).
Criminal case has been filed against my son and me under sec 138 and 420, and the case is in lower court now.
Can they sue me for Indeminity Bond in criminal court ? Can they take this up in Civil court after a lapse of 4 yrs .A Leagal notice was given to me dated 3 Dec 2001. asking me to pay the amount indeminified as my son has not paid .Till now no case is filed in civil court .If the party looses the Criminial case , can he sue me now to pay for my son.
3 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Time Bar Indeminity bond
You can not be made a party u/s 138/420. After 4 years the limitation has passed so no civil proceeding lie against you.
Re: Time Bar Indeminity bond
Since, you did not issue the cheque, a charge under Section 138 (Negotiable Instruments Act) will not stand against you.
To prove the ingredients of cheating (Section 420 IPC), the complainant has to prove that you had the INTENTION of cheating him, AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED AND DELIVERED the indemnity bond... often, it is quite difficult to prove the intention of a person to cheat, at a particular point of time. If such intention is not proved, the charge under Sec 420 will not stand.
The civil liability on the basis of a bond generally depends the averments made in such said bond. If the demand was communicated to you on 3rd December 2001, the limitation period for filing a civil Court will expire atleast on 2nd December 2004. If a civil suit is filed after that date, you can successfully defend yourself by raising the issue of limitation.
Re: Time Bar Indeminity bond
A case under Section 138 of the NI Act, under the Cheque can be filed against the Drawer of the Cheque, (in this case your son) only, and as as you are in no way connected to the negotiable instrument, you can apply to the Criminal court to have yourself discharged from this case itself. Even if you are a joint account holder, of the bank account you cannot be held jointly liablity under Section 138. As this is a time barred matter, if there is a posiablity if any part of the cheque has been altered or amended or even revalidated, then no action under Section 138 will lie. If your son can also establish by some other documents or indrect or circumstaintial evidence the fact of the repalyment of the loan also they you can be absolved of liablity.
As the matter is time bound, there can be no civil proceedings for recovery. An interesting point arises here, that any cheque has to be for the payment of the Lawfully payable Debt, if you can establish that the cheque discharges a debt that is no longer lawfully payable due to the civil law of limitation then your son can be discharged also, (but there is some conflict of the HC's on this point).
If you require get in touch with me with furthur details and I will be happy to advice you further.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Culpable homicide and murder Ram died due to such act done repeatedly by shyam... Asked 1/18/05, 9:15 am in India Criminal Law
-
Changing concept of cruelty i would like to know about the changing concept of... Asked 1/18/05, 3:52 am in India Criminal Law
-
Cheque bounce Dear sir, I have issued a cheque to the seller as surety on behalf of... Asked 1/10/05, 1:23 am in India Criminal Law
-
Section 420 a creditor gives a loan to a borrower by taking his cheque as well as a... Asked 12/26/04, 10:23 am in India Criminal Law
-
To appear before the court without getting any summon to get quashed the complai if... Asked 12/26/04, 8:22 am in India Criminal Law