Legal Question in Family Law in India
Hi All,
I need your help from your past Experiences faced related to DV act 2005.
Brief History
� 498a/406/34---Registered in CAW Nanak Pura but under investigation
� 7 Days notice already grant by court before arrest.
� Both FIL and Wife are GOVT Servant.
� Not Living since Nov 2009
� 10 months of Marriage, 8 month spend in Rented Accommodations near to wife office.
� DV Story is same as mentioned in the 498a FIR.
� Main Point: FIL has given 2 cheque 21000/41000 to me and claiming that these are a part of DOWRY in the DV Notice whereas She has admitted in the Stridhan List that all these are gifts to buy Engagement ring/Clothes.
1. Complaint Filled as per the rule 2 (B) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence rules , 2006 read with Sec 5 of DV act 2005..
2. Protection orders under section 18 as more specific mentioned in the application u/sec 12 DV act.
3. Residence orders under section 19 as more specific mentioned in the application u/sec 12 DV act.
4. Monetary Relief under section 20 as more specific mentioned in the application u/sec 12 DV act.
A. Medical Expenses: 10000 PM
B. Food, Clothes, Medications and other necessities : 10000 PM
C. Household Expenses 20000 PM
D. She is working and claims that Rs 35000 Salary and my 1 Lac.
5. Compensation orders under section 22 as more specific mentioned in the application u/sec 12 DV act.
6. Damages for the injuries including mental torture and emotional distress caused by the acts of DV committed by the respondent amounting to Rs 20 Lac
7. Interim and ex-parte orders under Sec 23 : Not sell the property which was in the named of my Mother and Brother.
� 2 years ago
� Report Abuse
Additional Details
1.Till Date i had not hired the Lawyer and i will close this soon with Good Criminal lawyer.
2.My wife has asked relief in all the above section in DV act also 23(2) for property share.
3.I had already Taken AB from the court for all members.
4.Can she get RTR? share me some strategy.
4 Answers from Attorneys
i agree with Adv Gupta
While i appreciate such detailed post i would still recommend you to consult a later in person to prepare strategy for this case.
Kind regards
Setu Niket
+91-9873109672
The order u/s 23 is wrong as the owner of the properties are your parents. You can get this stay on the property vacated. according to you message , you are facing lot of hardships and agony at the hands of your wife and inlaws.. I would too suggest that go for a good criminal and matrimonial lawyer to sail you through in your difficult time..............Please check Sanjay Kalra and Associates on the internet to know more about our law firm and the legal services we are rendering for our clients from all over the World.
Related Questions & Answers
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
