Legal Question in Civil Litigation in India

THE BASIC REVENUE RECORD documents is Pahani. I obtained a Pahani in 1984 at the time of Purchase of Land in 1984. As per Pahani The name of Pattadar mentioned . No where mentioned in Pahani it is restricted Land . In 2010 The revenue department confirms it is Assigned Land and Land allotted to pattadar only for agriculture and not for sale. If such restrictions as per Law to be mentioned in Pahani or not. To what extent legality can protect. Pahani information is basic information should confirm the pattadar name and his rights and any Government restrictions on the said land if any which is established practice. This point any legal confirmation is there. Please clarify


Asked on 1/27/13, 10:55 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys
Fca Prashant Chavan Expert Edge LLP

28.01.2013

Dear Sir / Madam,

(Attapur / Ramanthapur / Golconda - Hyderabad, Andra Pradesh)

Yes ... Revenue Department restriction(s) if any, on the land have to be mentioned in the original Pahani. Since you have the original document, your interests may be protected based on the facts of the matter. Judgements passed by the Andhra High Court in the following cases may be relied upon :

1.Mrs. Santhosh Verma And 3 Others vs 1.The Joint Collector, R.R. ... on 30 April, 2011

&

State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Bondapalli Sanyasi And Ors .... on 22 November, 2001

Regards,

FCA Prashant Chavan

Mumbai

(You can also mail me for any further on-line advice at [email protected])

Read more
Answered on 1/28/13, 12:41 am


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in India