Legal Question in Civil Litigation in India

The elder son of the family cheated illiterate widow mother and obtained the property. (Mother was made to believe the document were to pledge the property for loan. Instead a sale deed was registered). Before this incident, there was a discussion between both of them to sell the property to the elder son. He did recorded the discussion. However nothing has happened as discussed. The case is filed by the mother against her elder son and the judge has given an interim injunction to stay in the property.

In between he telephoned the mother and spoke about the sale discussion that they had earlier before the incident. He has recorded the telephonic conversation to his requirement. After this he is forcing her to withdraw the case else he said he will use the voice recording against her in the case.

My Quesiton:

How far the voice recording and telephonic conversations were acceptable in the Indian high court. Can this be used as a proof.

Need experts opinion...


Asked on 8/18/10, 3:11 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

RAJIV GUPTA (Cell: +91 9811284735) [email protected]

the recorded conversation has to be proved to be genuine and not tampered.

Read more
Answered on 8/29/10, 10:54 am


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in India