Legal Question in Real Estate Law in Iowa
leaky storm windows
We sold our house Aug. 2003. Earlier in the year we added a 3
seasons porch onto existing home. It is on a deck foundation and
has carpeting but, not insulated. We put in 7 storm windows. In our
10 months of having use of the porch before we sold it we had
problems ourselves with the storm windows leaking water inside
when it rained. I verbally told the new owners to be that the
windows did leak when it rained. In the disclosure we answered
''yes'' to the question ''are the windows in good working order.''
Because, generally yes they all work fine. Now, 10 months later
because Iowa has been getting huge amounts of rain they want to
sue us for new windows on the porch. Would this stand up in
court? Even though we told them on 2 occasions that the windows
did leak. Before they signed the papers they did have an inspector
go through the house and nothing was said about the leaky storm
windows. Or anything else of the house. Thankyou for any
information or advice you can give us. I would highly recommend
this website. Very informational.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: leaky storm windows
Sorry to be the one to give you bad news, but you might have a problem. The primary function of a window is to keep the elements outside the house. These particular windows do not sound to be fulfilling that basic function very well. Basically, your question seems to imply that you told them there was a problem with the windows, not once, but twice, and in the disclosure form you completed, you said there was no problem. That alone is not going to look very good to the judge or jury.
The best approach would have been to disclose completely any problem and explain it. If the problem was significant enough to tell them twice, I don't really understand why it wasn't important enough to check yes on your disclosure. When I have clients complete disclosures, I make sure they understand that they must disclose EVERY defect. As far as the inspector's report, it sounds like unless he happened to be there when it was raining, he would not know there was a problem.
By the very nature of Law Guru, you have only provided limited facts and no documentation, therefore, our response to your question is treated only as a hypothetical, and as such it is merely general in nature. You should not rely on this response in taking or forgoing action in your circumstances without discussing this matter with an attorney. If we had the opportunity to ask you sufficient questions and review relevant documents so that we were satisfied we had all of the relevant facts and circumstances, our response might differ significantly. Without the opportunity to ask you questions, and review all relevant documents and memoranda, we are simply unable to provide any form of legal advice. Our response to your question does not create any attorney-client relationship between us, and we are not acting as your attorney. We reserve the right to decline representation in any case. By answering your question, we are under no obligation to answer further questions. There are very specific deadlines for filing a lawsuit, replying to a lawsuit filed against you, or taking other action in order to preserve your legal rights. You should contact an attorney immediately in order to be fully advised of your rights, and so that you are aware of those deadlines. If you fail to act within the required time frame, you might be forever barred from asserting your rights or defending your position.
A lawyer�s time and advice are his stock and trade.
Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point out to them how the nominal winner is often a real loser - in fees, expenses, and waste of time. As a peacemaker the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man. There will still be business enough. Abraham Lincoln