Legal Question in Wills and Trusts in Louisiana
Inheritence & debt of sibling
My father passed away November 2006. He left no will. His estate has gone through and we have accepted succession of his property. I am one of four siblings. We have a buyer for the house. They buyer's attorney found a judgement against my father, which obviously we all agree to pay off the judgement owed to the bank. My question is it was also discovered my brother has several judgements against him, that add up to more than his 25% share of estate after paying off debt of father. Buyer's closing attorney is saying if we do not ''cover'' brother's extra money owed for judgements, house can not sell. We can't get a straight answer from our succession attorney, whom my brother also owes his portion of the legal fees to. How can the 3 other siblings be responsible for his debt that is more then he is entitled to get?
I live out of state, and can't get call backs from attorneys.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Inheritence & debt of sibling
Dear Friend,
Your question is loaded and would make a good one for a law school exam in Successions and/or Property or even Civil Procedure. Of course, even if the lawyer who was hired to handle the succession of your father knew about the judgment recorded against your father, an decision could have been made as to the merits and pros and cons of placing the four heirs into possession without administration, knowing this judgment against your father would attach to the undivided portions of the property that each heir would receive by the Judgment of Possession. There is a chance that it may have been more beneficial to the heirs if your father's succession hand been placed under administration, all the debts paid, and then the remainder of the estate divided equally among the four heirs. Of course, to pay off this judgment, it may have been necessary for the Successon Representative (Administrator/Executor/Executirx) to have the property sold to get the money to pay the debts prior to dividing equally among the heirs what was left of the estate after the debts, charges of administration, inclucing court costs, attorney fees and such were paid. Had it not been for the judgment against your brother, it would have made sense to handle the estate like it was handled, especially if it was known by all involved, including the estate attorney, that it was the intention of all the heirs to sell their undivided interests, assuming that the value of the estate (land and improvements) thereon exceeded the amount of the judgment that had to be paid off before any buyer who would examine title would close the deal.
NOTE: Upon my attempting to post my complete reply, the computer advised that the complete answer cannot exceed 3,000 characters; which mine obviously did. THERFORE, if you will e-mail me your e-mail address, I will send you the full answer by return e-mail. I have copied it and will save it to a Word Document and e-mail it to you. My e-mail address is [email protected].
Sincerely,
Hardy Parkerson, Atty. - Lake Charles - [email protected]