Legal Question in Bankruptcy in Maryland
Employer chapter 11 question
My company just filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy, leaving most of the employees out of a job and without compensation for a month's worth of pay, unpaid expenses, and so on. This company is a subsidiary of another company. There are some employees that had transfers to the parent company backdated so they would receive paychecks for the time they worked for the bankrupt company, so they would continue to work and collect debts, etc. This seems to me to at least be unethical, but is it also illegal?
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Employer chapter 11 question
On the one hand the parent can argue that it is being a Good Samaritan by taking care of the people who have taken care of it. Given the holiday season and the events of September 11, this type of altruism is not surprising.
The one potential illegalty I see would have to do with their taxes. The company may end up reporting salary expenses that they did not incur during the prior month. Shareholders could also bring a suit where this action drives up expenses unnecessarily and adversely impacts shareholder wealth. The company may be opening itself up to a shareholder's derivative suit.
I sincerely cannot call this action unethical given the reason for doing it, however, the action has created exposure to potential legal action. Also, were all employees treated this way? There may be grounds for discrimination claims but I am not sure on this one.
Alton Drew
Alton Drew
Re: Employer chapter 11 question
Retaining the employees to collect debts is proper
in a Chapter 11. Moreover, the employees' back pay gains
the highest priority during the bankruptcy proceeding so
retaining them and paying them to effect the collection
of debts is a proper function during such a proceeding. Otherwise, the
company could have hired collection agents or attorneys to
pursue the claims and this clearly would not have been a
good economic choice. There are a multitude of other issues
embedded in your situation, and these are too numerous to address given the
lack of factual matter provided in your question. The following are just a few: discrimination claims may lie,
inequity with severance packages, usurpation of opportunity (the parent company seizing
resources properly attributed to the subsidiary company), and diversion
of assets subject to the bankruptcy (where the collected debts were not included in the proceeding).
DISCLAIMER: The foregoing is not legal advice but rather information about the law. No attorney-client
relationship is founded by this communication and no reliance thereon should be placed. This information is neither
confidential or priviledged. When dealing with a legal issue, the best advice is to obtain the assistance of an attorney.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Can a creditor force your to give back furniture after a chapter 7 is discharged I... Asked 12/28/01, 9:07 am in United States Maryland Bankruptcy Law
-
Claiming bankruptcy I was discharged chapter 13 10 years ago. Due to personel... Asked 12/27/01, 7:07 pm in United States Maryland Bankruptcy Law
-
What if I have a 2nd mortgage? I am debating whether or not to file Chapter 7. I... Asked 12/10/01, 10:26 am in United States Maryland Bankruptcy Law
-
Property Lien found after bankruptcy filed I was trying to refinance my home and... Asked 12/04/01, 5:43 pm in United States Maryland Bankruptcy Law