Legal Question in Civil Rights Law in Maryland

If the mall is privately owned, the question is whether there is a constitutional basis for the protection of free expression on private property. Does the wearing of a veil or mask in the mall constitute peaceful political activity in a quasi-public place? Should a company be able to exclude those who conceal their identities from their property to protect themselves and the public from crime? Does it make a difference if the person conceals their identity for a medical or religious purpose, and how can we tell the difference? This is a complicated issue that has been and will continue to be debated among state legislatures and courts.