Legal Question in Credit and Debt Law in Maryland

MBNA CC Charged off, Walpoff & Abramson claim suing for 'plaintiff MBNA''

MBNA charged off the CC debt. I am assuming that it was then ''purchased'' by Wolpoff and Abramson for collections. On the summons, MBNA is listed as the plaintiff. If MBNA charged this off and W&A bought this, is W&A not the plaintiff? Is it legitimate for W&A to claim MBNA is their client and 'plaintiff' if the account was charged off?


Asked on 12/07/04, 8:30 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys
Carolyn Gilden Krohn Law Offices of Carolyn Gilden Krohn

Re: MBNA CC Charged off, Walpoff & Abramson claim suing for 'plaintiff MBNA''

Wolpoff & Abramson is a law firm that specializes in collections. Their client in this case is MBNA, and even though the debt was charged off by them it is still collectible (unless it has been more than three years since you made a payment on the account or acknowledged the debt in any way). Unfortunately, this is legitimate. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Read more
Answered on 12/08/04, 6:16 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Credit, Debt and Collections Law questions and answers in Maryland