Legal Question in Family Law in Maryland

paternity

years ago i took my sons father to court to prove paternity. He opted for a jury trial, no blood tests were done. he was found not to be the father because he had a better lawyer than i did. I was told at the time by the state attorney that it could not be appealed,something about double jeopardy. Is it possible for this case to ever be opened again? This man is my sons father a blood test would have proved that. My son is now 20, he was only 1 at the time. Is there anyway either i or my son can ever take this man back to court? i was on welfare at the time and this was all handled through social services and the state attorneys office. my son grew up without a lot of things and i can not legaly reveal who his father is because of the decision made by 12 strangers


Asked on 9/05/01, 10:01 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Robert Sher Wagshal and Sher

Re: paternity

I'm sorry, I don't believe you can relitigate this issue. The reason for this isn't strictly double jeopardy, which applies in criminal cases, but it's pretty much the same thing. I'm surprised the attorney (who I assume was with the state's attorney's office) at the time didn't insist on getting blood tests since this is standard procedure in paternity cases. Even that long ago, the blood test would have almost conclusively established whether or not the defendant was the father of your son.

Read more
Answered on 10/25/01, 12:17 pm
G. Joseph Holthaus III Law Offices of G. Joseph Holthaus

Re: paternity

Double jeopardy does not apply to civil cases, only to criminal cases.

However, there is a parallel concept with civil cases such as the one related

to your question. This concept is the combined effect of res judicata and collateral

estoppel. These are fancy legal terms for saying that a matter once litigated cannot be

litigated again or a fact once found through litigation which relates to a similar matter brought

in subsequent litigation will not be adjudged again (whether by jury or judge). These

limitations must be raised properly by the defendant or they are waived, so you certainly could bring

the matter and hope that he does not assert these limits. Moreover, there are specific

reasons where the limits may not apply or can be circumvented. Other litigation techniques may

apply and there are other strategies. Although blood testing was available 20 years ago, it was

costly and, although I am not a scientist but could find an answer, possibly not as widely accepted or accurate.

Now the real issues. Why do you want to contest this matter? After having raised your son, why would you want him

involved? If the man has no conscience and no morals, why bother with him? Would not it hurt your son more to

know that such a man is his father? Unless there is a specific issue with intestacy or inheritance, I wonder why you

would raise the issue. Many times, especially when there are legal issues, having knowledge can be painful. Further information is clearly needed on my part. If all you want is for him to know who is father is,

there may be other courses of action and these we would need to discuss.

I am available at a reasonable rate if you should desire to pursue the matter.

Contact me at (410) 799-9002 or at [email protected]

DISCLAIMER: NOTHING HEREIN IS INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE AND SHOULD NOT

BE RECEIVED OR INFERRED AS SUCH. WHEN CONFRONTED WITH A LEGAL ISSUE, THE BEST COURSE

OF ACTION IS TO ACQUIRE THE SERVICE OF AN ATTORNEY.

Read more
Answered on 10/25/01, 5:06 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody and Adoption questions and answers in Maryland