Legal Question in Insurance Law in Maryland

Is a medical rider signed by a 17-year-old legally binding?

My 17-year-old daughter has been in my legal

custody since the time she was born and has had

no contact with her father. Her father was ordered

to provide medical insurance for her. When he

changed jobs the insurance changed and I filled

out medical records as part of the application

process for my daughter. Later, a

"Rider-Amendment to Policy/ Certificate" was

addressed to my daughter and signed and

returned to the insurance company by her. The

exclusion refers to jaw surgery which she has

been scheduled to have for two years. She has

since had the surgery. Is this exclusion, signed by

my 17-year-old daughter legally binding? Will I be

able to claim any insurance benefits for the jaw

surgery? The home office of the insurance

company is in Illinois, another address on their

stationary lists offices in Indiana, my daughter's

father is in Delaware (?maybe) and my daughter

and I are in Maryland.


Asked on 9/29/00, 10:41 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Lawrence Holzman Holzman Law Firm, LLC

Re: Is a medical rider signed by a 17-year-old legally binding?

Generally speaking, a minor does not have the capacity to enter into a legally binding contract. However, there is a generally accepted exception to that rule when the contract is for "necessaries". There is some question as to whether that doctrine would apply to these circumstances. Typically, the doctrine is intended to make sure that persons who provide goods and/or services to a minor get paid for them if the goods and/or services are basic necessities. Conceivably, the doctrine wouldn't apply to terms in a contract such as an exclusion in an insurance contract (which would not reasonably be understandble to a minor).

However, there's a bigger problem which is that the contract really isn't between your daughter and the insurance company, it's between the company and her father. The terms of the contract will cover provisions for pre-existing conditions. If there are exlusions for pre-existing conditions, they may properly exclude coverage. In that analysis, the form that you daughter completed was just a way of giving information to the insurance company. Minors are capable of conveying "information" consistent with their age and maturity. A 17 year old could be construed as sufficiently mature to have properly conveyed the information to the insurance carrier.

In order to make a definitive determination, you would need to get a copy of the insurance contract itself, plus the actual rider, and then have an attorney read them to see if there is any hole in this exclusion.

Lawrence R. Holzman, Esquire

Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, P.A.

6404 Ivy Lane, Suite 400

Greenbelt, MD 20770

(301) 220-2200

fax (301) 220-1214

Disclaimer: Please note that the posting of this response is not intended to constitute legal advice. You should contact an attorney to obtain information applicable to your situation. This posting is not confidential or privileged and does not create an attorney/client relationship.

Read more
Answered on 10/30/00, 10:21 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Insurance Law questions and answers in Maryland