Legal Question in Personal Injury in Maryland

wrongful death

in maryland the defendant is presumed to have died before the victim,does that change erisa benefits to go to the estate. defendant murdered his wife and is survived by two adult children. he filed for retirement benefits before the act.


Asked on 11/30/07, 1:03 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

G. Joseph Holthaus III Law Offices of G. Joseph Holthaus

Re: wrongful death

The wording of the question lends curiously to an assumption that this is a school assignment. Going against this assumption I will provide insight.

Maryland's slayer rule is arguably the strictest in the Nation. It disinherits not only the slayer but the progeny of the slayer. This addresses the basic facts concerning your question.

The slayer rule is in opposition to ERISA's pre-emption of state law. ERISA does not have equivalent slayer provisions, thus requiring the administrator to pay benefits as designated. The specific issue of opposition with the slayer rule was declined for resolution during the Supreme Court's hearing of Eglehoff during the 2001 term, see 532 U.S. 141, 152 (2001).

The opposition with Federal preemption of ERISA and state law has not been settled with many legal issues. There analysis and litigation of these matters are certain to keep attorneys busy.

Read more
Answered on 11/30/07, 8:48 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Personal Injury Law and Tort Law questions and answers in Maryland