Legal Question in Civil Rights Law in Massachusetts
Homosexual Marriage
On May 17,2004 the SJC of Massachusetts has ordered that homosexual couples be allowed to legally marry. The Legislature of Massachusetts is trying to put a question on the 2006 ballot that would state that marriage in the Massachusetts can only be between one man and one woman, and homosexual couples can have a civil union (which would not include the federal benefits that a marriage license would).
Question: If a homosexual couple is legally married at any time between May 17, 2004 and the implementation of the 2006 ballot question (providing it passes), are those marriages ''grandfathered'' in or can they be revoked or reduced to civil unions?
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Homosexual Marriage
To REVOKE a statute, there must be an existing statute to revoke.
There is no existing statute here, so REVOCATION will be impossible.
To GRANDFATHER something is to allow something
that has existed over a defined period of time
to continue existing as it has done in the past.
Take, for example, a house that has existed on 7000 square feet of land in a town.
The towh later decides to put in 2-acre zoning
where the "old" house is.
The old house is GRANDFATHERED.
To make that 2-acre zoning law affect the
old house would be making an EX POST FACTO law. That would be UNconstitutional.
Laws sometimes have retroactive effect but only when it concerns something procedural, not when it concerns something substantive.
To say that the old house can no longer sit on 7000 square feet would be affecting retroactively the SUBSTANTIVE
rights of the owner. And that's a BIG NO NO.
SO, a gay marriage as of May 17th would have to be GRANDFATHERED were the people to
vote for no gay marriages in 2006.
Re: Homosexual Marriage
This is a constitutional question. You should contact the Gay and Lesbian Bar Association of one of the atorneys who argued the case.