Legal Question in Family Law in Massachusetts

: divorce

It is unclear what you mean by the judge indicated. You raise some complex matters that need clarification.

If you need assistance, contact me.

p.s. - are you represented by a lawyer?

Re: divorce

It appears to me that the judge has indicated that he or she has resolved the equities against you on the retirement. In essence, your question indicates that you were no part of helping him accrue his retirement. As to alimony, the ruling you describe again indicates that, as a matter of equity, you are not entitled, having made your own way for 14 years. This could reflect a collection of concepts, including laches ("sitting on your hands too long"), the length of your separation without alimony, and simple statutory limitations (normally, the date of service is the first date on which you can collect ongoing support).

Each divorce case is decided on its particular facts. The judge is usually deemed "correct" in his or her rulings of fact unless discretion has been abused. The law of property division and alimony both depend heavily on applying equity ("fairness") to the facts found, so an appellate court is must determine that the judge was plainly wrong in understanding the law and equity before overturning such a determination.

Re: divorce

You are unlikely to get alimony for the last 14 years, since you have waited so long to seek support. As to his assets, that is a different story. But the judge appears to have waived the equities against you.

If you do not have an attorney you should get one immediately.

Re: divorce

The Judge has discretion over this matter.