Legal Question in Civil Litigation in Massachusetts
Fraud necessary to over turn an arbitration award
The elements necessary in Massachusetts to overturn an arbitration award for fraud. What type of fraud, intrinsic or extrinsic would be necessary? Am I correct that Mass has done away with intrinsic and extrinsic fraud? If so what are elements necessary to have the judge rule, fraud? What exactly is fraud on the court? This is a divorce award. Leaving aside the issue of damages.
3 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Fraud necessary to over turn an arbitration award
The answer to your question calls for a very lengthy response. You mention no facts, but only a very broad question on one area of law.
Re: Fraud necessary to over turn an arbitration award
There is a lot to your questions presented, and some of them are impossible to answer without a lot of specific information. Since it is quite unusual to have arbitration in divorce cases, I would also want to verify that the ADR process in which you participated was arbitration and not mediation (which is very common).
If there actually is a binding arbitral award involved, you should realize that there is a very high bar to overturn an award for fraud. The general provisions for setting aside an arbitral award are set forth in Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 251, �12. However, I have doubts about whether an arbitration can conclusively resolve certain issues (e.g., alimony or child support) without the probate court's separate determination of fairness. You need to consult a qualified family-law attorney in this regard.
Best wishes,
LDWG
Re: Fraud necessary to over turn an arbitration award
Here are some excerpts from two recent cases.
================================
Margaret B. SPENLINHAUER, Plaintiff/Appellant
v.Paul M. KANE, and others, Defendants/Appellees
Aug. 4, 1998.
----------------
663 N.E.2d 867
40 Mass.App.Ct. 315
John M. REYNOLDS v. Anne WHITMAN. Decided April 24, 1996.
Further Appellate Review Denied June 11, 1996.