Legal Question in Civil Litigation in Massachusetts

Fraud necessary to over turn an arbitration award

The elements necessary in Massachusetts to overturn an arbitration award for fraud. What type of fraud, intrinsic or extrinsic would be necessary? Am I correct that Mass has done away with intrinsic and extrinsic fraud? If so what are elements necessary to have the judge rule, fraud? What exactly is fraud on the court? This is a divorce award. Leaving aside the issue of damages.


Asked on 6/02/02, 4:32 pm

3 Answers from Attorneys

William McLeod McLeod Law Offices, PC

Re: Fraud necessary to over turn an arbitration award

The answer to your question calls for a very lengthy response. You mention no facts, but only a very broad question on one area of law.

Read more
Answered on 6/03/02, 9:22 am
Lawrence Graves Coolidge & Graves PLLC

Re: Fraud necessary to over turn an arbitration award

There is a lot to your questions presented, and some of them are impossible to answer without a lot of specific information. Since it is quite unusual to have arbitration in divorce cases, I would also want to verify that the ADR process in which you participated was arbitration and not mediation (which is very common).

If there actually is a binding arbitral award involved, you should realize that there is a very high bar to overturn an award for fraud. The general provisions for setting aside an arbitral award are set forth in Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 251, �12. However, I have doubts about whether an arbitration can conclusively resolve certain issues (e.g., alimony or child support) without the probate court's separate determination of fairness. You need to consult a qualified family-law attorney in this regard.

Best wishes,

LDWG

Read more
Answered on 6/03/02, 1:02 pm
Barbara C. Johnson Law Office of Barbara C. Johnson

Re: Fraud necessary to over turn an arbitration award

Here are some excerpts from two recent cases.

================================

Margaret B. SPENLINHAUER, Plaintiff/Appellant

v.Paul M. KANE, and others, Defendants/Appellees

Aug. 4, 1998.

----------------

663 N.E.2d 867

40 Mass.App.Ct. 315

John M. REYNOLDS v. Anne WHITMAN. Decided April 24, 1996.

Further Appellate Review Denied June 11, 1996.

Read more
Answered on 6/15/02, 12:34 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in Massachusetts