Legal Question in Criminal Law in Michigan
Miranda rights in Michigan
I was stopped for driving while suspended-2nd offense. I was stopped by BloomField Police Department, placed in handcuffs. The police officers questioned me in regards to my DWLS BEFORE they had taken me to the station (Police). After arriving and while I was being booked, the officers, one patrolwoman and her lieutent countuined to question me in regards to the DWLS. I have now nor never been read my Miranda rights. I have an attorney and also hve had my trial in which I pled gulity to the charge and awaiting sententing. Can this or will this have any bearing on my case?? Can it be repealed?? Also should this be brought up at my sententecing and what affect might it have on my case???
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Miranda rights in Michigan
I don't think that this is an issue that affects your guilt, or your sentence. DWLS charges are pretty easy to prove, and prosecutors (like myself) rarely need 'confessions' to make our case. If the cop or another witness saw you driving, and your driving record shows that you were suspended at the time, you're guilty.
Miranda Rights are ingrained in our heads. We hear them on TV and in movies every day, so people think that police MUST "read people their rights" in all circumstances. That is not true.
"Miranda Rights" need only be told to suspects when (a) they are in police 'custody', and (b) police question/interrogate the suspect about possible criminal conduct.
If you are in custody and they interrogate you and you have been properly informed of these rights, then any incriminating statements can be used in court. If the rights should have been read, but were not, then the People cannot introduce your statement in their evidence to prove your guilt. Likewise, if you are not in police 'custody' when you are questioned, then Miranda protections do not kick in, and your statements will not be thrown out because Miranda rights were not read.
This last scenerio applies in many traffic stops. Most times, you are not "in custody" in a traffic stop ... until you are formally arrested. If you're in your car and the office quesitons you through your window, Miranda protections do not apply. (There are several Court of Appeals decisions affirming this.)
In your case, your words at the scene should be admissible, but your words at the police station might be thrown out because you were in custody.
The only down-side to the People's case against you, if you were not properly informed of your Miranda Rights, is that any incriminating statement you made pursuant to police quesitoning while in police custody, could be ruled inadmissible. But, unless the ONLY means of proving that "YOU done it" is your confession, then the charge would not be dismissed even if the confession is thrown out.
Have you talked to your attorney about this? You already pled guilty to the DWLS charge!! By doing that, you waived any legal challenges to the case (police conduct re: the traffic stop, your confession, etc.). I seriously doubt that the sentencing judge will change your sentence because you were not read your Miranda Rights. The real sentencing issue is YOUR conduct (driving when you shouldn't have), not the cop's.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Appeals exhausted-any other recourse to get back to court My son has been... Asked 4/08/01, 1:17 pm in United States Michigan Criminal Law
-
Restoring rights? have been convicted of a felony and a misdemeanor. it has been... Asked 3/09/01, 7:07 pm in United States Michigan Criminal Law
-
Media Can an attorney stop the press release, so the prosecuter would not have it... Asked 3/09/01, 11:16 am in United States Michigan Criminal Law