Legal Question in Family Law in Michigan
ERISA employee retirement income security act amendment
Is there an amendment to the employee retirement income security act that prohibits a qualified domestic relations order to extract or withdraw funds from a retirement in case of divorce? My husband advises I am not entitled to 1 dime of his retirement when we divorce because he works as a university police captain and he is considered a state employee. We have been married 5 years. Total increase in retirement earnings is $400,000. I am only asking for $50,000. He tells me take maybe $25,000 and run no judge will order it. Help. Thank you.
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: ERISA employee retirement income security act amendment
Why are you posting this question on a forum such as this? Ask your lawyer! Your husband's attitude clearly reveals that you need one! However, your husband is running a scam on you. There are restrictions on the division of a state employee's pension. However, the statute provides ways of getting around them. Additionally, some jusges will take the position that if there is a problem accessing a pension plan, they will simply award the non-employee spouse a larger share of the property settlement. These are all matters you should discuss with your attorney. John C. Talpos (http://www.mich-layer.com)
Re: ERISA employee retirement income security act amendment
Dear Madam:
This is in response to your email of July 18, 2001, which this office received on July 18, 2001.
I am unaware of any amendment to a law that would prohibit an Eligible Domestic Relations Order (�EDRO�) to be implemented during a divorce proceeding. An EDRO is similar to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order, but it applies to federal, state or local government retirement plans. Generally, a spouse is entitled to � of the marital portion of the other spouse�s retirement plan. However, before I can advise you more fully I would have to review the specific retirement plan to determine the qualifying events that would entitle you to your share of the proceeds. As you can imagine the statutory language and the plan requirements are complex and, at times, somewhat vague.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Eberth
(313) 561-5700