Legal Question in Family Law in Michigan

Re: moving state to state have violated state laws

TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION PROPERLY AN ATTORNEY WOULD HAVE TO CAREFULLY REVIEW YOUR JUDGMENT OF DIVORCE TO SEE HOW IT IS WORDED. THE PURPOSE FOR SUCH CLAUSES IS TO PROTECT THE VISITATION RIGHTS OF THE NON-CUSTODIAL PARENT. IT APPEARS FROM YOUR QUESTION THAT THE COURT DID ALLOW YOU TO RELOCATE TO OHIO FROM MICHIGAN. SINCE YOUR MOVE TO OHIO HOW HAS THE VISITATION BEEN GOING BETWEEN YOUR EX AND THE CHILDREN? HOW HAS THIS VISITATION CHANGED SINCE YOUR MOVE TO WASHINGTON? WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE YOU MOVED TO WASHINGTON? WAS IT TO CAUSE A HARDSHIP ON THE NON-CUSTODIAL PARENT OR WAS IT TO BETTER THE LIFE OF YOUR MINOR CHILDREN? THE ANSWER TO THESE QUESTIONS WILL GO A LONG WAY IN DETERMINING IF YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER. THE WORST TAHT CAN HAPPEN IS THAT THE JUDGE WILL ORDER A CHANGE IN CUSTODY. THAT HOWEVER IS A REMOTE POSSIBILITY PROVIDING YOUR MOVE WAS FOR LEGITIMATE REASONS. THE COURT MAY REQUIRE YOU TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE IN EXPENSE OF VISITATION BETWEEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI AND WASHINGTON AND MISSOURI. GOOD LUCK. SINCE NEITHER YOUR EX NOR YOU RESIDE IN MICHIGAN YOU MIGHT WANT TO CONSIDER HAVING YOUR CASE TRANSFERRED TO WASHINGTON FOR OVERSIGHT.