Legal Question in Wills and Trusts in Minnesota
Problems with a sibling PR
A sibling and beneficiary, A, is to be voted the estate's PR by the other siblings in lieu of a void will. There is a house involved that a different sibling, B, wants to buy from the other siblings. A and B bicker before court and we end up on a supervised path. Why should I have to pay extra in legal fees for their costly behavior? When the attorney bills the estate, can the payment of that fee be charged against beneficiary shares in different percentages? In general, if the attorney represents the PR, why should the other beneficiaries have to pay the same amount of legal fees to begin with? They benefit to some extent, but not the same degree. There is also a life insurance payout involved that is not beholden to probate, but the PR won't distribute it, and in general is aloof with disclosure and is adversarial. Can I hold a hearing to move for my share of that payout now since I'm apparently legally entitled? One more thing, can the profit from the sale of the house and bulk of the estate be distributed now while we wait for minor possessions to be sold off? Thanks much for taking the time to answer any/all of these.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Problems with a sibling PR
Everyone has to pay the same amount for attorney's fees unless the family
would agree to
something else. The non-probate asset should be paid out immediately, but
who is it payable
to? The beneficiaries of the insurance should all have acess to the
information. there could be
a problem if the beneficiary is the PR or only one of the children. How
long has the estate been
open? An estate has to be open for a four month claim period, but under
Minnesota Statutes,
a supervised estate does not HAVE to be closed for 18 months. Also, if the
estate is supervised,
the PR is not supposed to distribute anything unless the court allows
advanced or partial distribution
and allows the accounting. I think, if you are a beneficiary of the
insurance, you could petition the
court for that to be distributed, but then again, if it isn't a probate
asset, would the court issue an order
for distribution on a non-probate asset. It may have to declared a probate
asset first.