Legal Question in Criminal Law in Mississippi

Re: interfering with police

IT IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO INTERFERE WITH POLICE ACTIONS BY MERELY ASKING ONE REASONABLE QUESTION. YOU WERE WELL WITHIN YOUR RIGHTS OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH. HE HAD NO AUTHORITY TO BE ON YOUR PROPERTY WITHOUT A WARRANT. IN ORDER TO BE LIABLE FOR INTERFERING WITH THE POLICE OFFICER IN THE COURSE OF HIS DUTIES YOU HAVE TO IMPEDE HIS ABILITY TO DO SOME TASK WHICH IS NEEDED IN THE REASONABLE PERFORMANCE OF HIS JOB.

I AGREE THAT IT APPEARS FROM WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN, (IF YOU PROVIDED THE FULL DETAILS FOR THE CONFRONTATION) THAT THE CHARGE IS UNREASONABLE. "DISORDERLY CONDUCT" AND "INTERFERING WITH THE DUTIES OF A POLICE OFFICER" REFER TO A SINGLE CHARGE. IT IS "DISORDERLY" BECAUSE OF INTERFERENCE WITH THE DUTIES OF THE POLICE OFFICER. HOWEVER, IT HAS TO BE A LAWFUL DUTY OF THE OFFICER AND IT SEEMS THE INQUIRY ABOUT WHY THE SISTER WAS IN THE "ER" IS A REASONABLE RESPONSE TO THE NEWS THAT SHE WAS THERE.

I SUGGEST YOU IMMEDIATELY CONSULT COMPETENT COUNSEL. YOU MAY WANT TO FIND OUT JUST HOW MANY OTHER TIMES THIS SAME OFFICER HAS ACCUSED OTHERS OF THE "INTERFERING WITH POLICE OFFICER" OFFENSE AND UPON INVESTIGATING THIS SITUATION YOU MAY DISCOVER THIS POLICE OFFICER IS NARCISSITIC AND YOU MAY DISCOVER THAT HE VERY QUICKLY ACCUSES PEOPLE OF INTERFERING ALBEIT THERE WAS NO INTERFERING. THIS SEEMS AS IF THE OFFICER IS ON A POWER STRUGGLE AND HE LIKES TO MISUSE HIS LEGAL AUTHORITY TO FILE FALSE CHARGES ON POOR UNSUSPECTING CITIZENS.

HIRE AN ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY AFTER YOU GET A COPY OF ALL OF THE PAPERS FROM THE COURT RELEVANT TO PAST CHARGES OF THIS NATURE FILED BY THE SAME OFFICER.