Legal Question in Credit and Debt Law in Missouri
Personal Check writing
I went to a garage sale and wrote a check to the lady for $23.00 in August 1998. I recieved a phone call from her approximately one wk ago. She advised me that she had not cashed the check yet but tried to do so that day. The bank would not cash the check because it was more than 6 months old. She
asked if I could send her a new check, I advised that I would after checking on the status of the one she currently has. Over the course of the wk I have recieved 4 phone calls from re: the check. I have only researched the status of the check partially. She is now saying that she is going to take the check to the Prosecutor's office for collection. Since I have given her payment and she failed to collect on it, Am I responsible for giving her new payment? I have no problem giving her a money order for 23.00 upon receipt of my old check.
3 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Personal Check writing
How smart of you! I like your thinking.
Alternatives (which aren't any better):
1) You could also put a stop payment on the check, at
some huge expense to yourself because banks like to
charge about $25 for that!
2) If the payee was refused by her own teller,
tell the payee to just try some other bank(s)
with sleepy tellers or deposit to a bank machine;
I've cashed stale checks before many a time. But
I would check first carefully with your own bank
to be sure that they would overlook the date if
presented with the check.
3) Best answer yet:
Tell her that this isn't worth the fuss, leave
a message on her answering machine (which she could
then save for her own protection) telling her that
you 'authorize' her to change the date herself. I
once left a restaurant after paying with a credit
card and they phoned me up at home and told me that
I had to come back down there to sign. It was late,
I was full and sleepy, they were far away, and I just
told the guy to scribble something illegible on the
signature line for me. He refused, I refused to come
back down there (though I was probably wrong, legally,
in that case, since it was my duty to pay and I had not
really paid!), and then I told him to write on the
signature line "T.O." as an abbreviation for a telephone
order, which I'd been told once when I was a credit
card merchant, was acceptable when the client wasn't
present to sign personally. As long as I didn't
challenge the charge when I got my bill, he'd be paid
and everyone would be happy. That's how that got
resolved.
Stuart Williams
Law Offices of Stuart J. Williams
21 Walter St.
Re: Personal Check writing
Continuation of last message ...
Then check your next statement to be sure she didn't
change the amount, too!
4) You could stiff her (just button up and refuse to pay, arbitrarily), but I
personally would rather not see you do it. It isn't the legal thing to do and
it could blow up a relatively small matter into a larger one.
---------
To answer a few more questions which must be in your mind:
a) You're probably not violating state check bouncing
criminal statutes if you don't honor the check at this late
date; you 'tendered' good payment and the payee did the
equivalent almost of losing the cash, if you see what I mean.
But that is merely argumentative on my part and I cannot
speak authoritatively about your state's laws!
b) Even though she called often, you don't really have a
good legitimate right to offset what you once owed her
(and to stiff her) because she's annoyed you. If that
got to be MUCH worse, you could start with criminal
telephone harassment charges -- at least we have those
here in MA, anyway -- but that requires a lot of documented
calls, usually at odd hours and/or involving nasty language
or the like. Civilly, you could make such an argument, but
I'm fairly confident that you wouldn't win an award of $23 or
more for the emotional distress the calls caused. In general,
creditors have the right to make a reasonable number of calls
at reasonable times to people that owe them money.
c) You do, still, legally owe the money. No doubt.
But practically speaking, what does that mean?
She could sue you for it and win perhaps the money plus a small
filing fee after she spends half a day of your time and
hers in court ... not a wise choice for either side.
There ... you just got $75 legal advice on a $23 issue!
Good luck. I'd appreciate it if you would tell me what
happens, please. Write directly to me at [email protected] and
be sure to make reference to your $23 stale check as a reference
point, otherwise I won't know who you are.
G'luck!
Stuart Williams
Law Offices of Stuart J. Williams
21 Walter St.
Re: Personal Check writing
You're correct, unless there are additional facts.
If the check was returned because it was stale, you need not worry about criminal prosecution- some states make it a crime to bounce a check, but normally that would prevail in circumstances where the person writing the check knew there were insufficient funds to cover it.
Do not pay the money until you receive the old check back, otherwise you could find yourself involved in legal proceedings demanding that you pay twice.
Good luck!
Susan Freiman
The Legal Clinic
P.O. Box 9407, Herzlia Street 29