Legal Question in Civil Litigation in New Jersey

Extortion

My young teen was caught shoplifting in NJ and she was put on probation in juvenile court. In the meantime I received a second notice from a law firm representing the store that since I had not paid them $150 in civil damages within 20 days as provided under NJSA 2A:61C-1 (I had never received the first letter) they were now demanding $425 and threatened a lawsuit if I did not pay. I called them to make inquiries and they were willing to settle for $360 but I told them I wanted proof they sent the initial letter. Under friendly advice from a lawyer in my company, I sent them a letter indicating that since I had never received the first notification and they could not provide proof that I had, I was therefore ''submitting $150 as full satisfaction.'' Now they are sending me monthly letters demanding the full balance and threatening they will increase the amount due or possibly a lawsuit. They also call my home daily and leave electronic voice messages on my answering machine. The letterhead appears to be a law firm but printed on cheap paper and they provide convenient methods of payment - Palmerpay, moneygram, and credit card with extraordinary convenience fees. Should I pay or stand firm?


Asked on 7/12/07, 6:57 am

3 Answers from Attorneys

Scott Levinson Korybski & Levinson

Re: Extortion

The statute reads:

"2A:61C-1 Shoplifting, retail thefts, civil action; provided.

1. a. A person who commits the offense of shoplifting as defined in N.J.S.2C:20-11 or a person who commits the offense of theft as defined in Chapter 20 of Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes by stealing food or drink from an eating establishment shall be liable for any criminal penalties imposed by law and shall be liable to the merchant in a civil action in an amount equal to the following:

(1)The value of the merchandise as damages, not to exceed $500, if the merchandise cannot be restored to the merchant in its original condition;

(2)Additional damages, if any, arising from the incident, not to include any loss of time or wages incurred by the merchant in connection with the apprehension of the defendant; and

(3)A civil penalty payable to the merchant in an amount of up to $150.

b.A parent, guardian or other person having legal custody of a minor who commits the offense of shoplifting or the offense of theft of food or drink from an eating establishment shall be liable to the merchant for the damages specified in subsection a. of this section. This subsection shall not apply to a parent whose parental custody and control of such minor has been removed by court order, decree, judgment, military service, or marriage of such infant, or to a resource family parent of such minor.

c.If a merchant institutes a civil action pursuant to the provisions of this section, the prevailing party in that action shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees and reasonable court costs.

d.Limitations on civil action:

(1)Before a civil action may be commenced, the merchant shall send a notice to the defendant's last known address giving the defendant 20 days to respond. It is not a condition precedent to maintaining an action under this act that the defendant has been convicted of shoplifting or theft.

(2)No civil action under this act may be maintained if the defendant has paid the merchant a penalty equal to the retail value of the merchandise where the merchandise was not recovered in its original condition, plus a sum of up to $150.

(3)The provisions of this act do not apply in any case where the value of the merchandise exceeds $500.

e.If the person to whom a written demand is made complies with such demand within 20 days following the receipt of the demand, that person shall be given a written release from further civil liability with respect to the specific act of shoplifting or theft."

Accordingly, from my reading of the statute, the merchant is entitled to $150.00 plus the value of the merchandise if it could not be restored and any "additional damages" (however I would think that the merchant has to prove what those "additional damages" were). I don't see anything in this statute about a penalty charge for not paying within 20 days of notification, unless they are trying to tack on attorneys fees.

Read more
Answered on 7/12/07, 9:07 am
Robert Davies The Davies Law Firm, P.A.

Re: Extortion

This nonsense is a lawfirm trying to force more money from you, plain and simple.

It would cost for me to put a stop to this. I would be happy to help.

They might have violated Federal law, Fair Debt Collections Act, or maybe not.

Call me if you like.

Read more
Answered on 7/12/07, 10:01 am
Jef Henninger, Esq Law Offices of Jef Henninger, Esq.

Re: Extortion

I agree with the other attorneys, you are probably better just paying them since it will cost too much to fight it.

Read more
Answered on 7/12/07, 11:39 am


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in New Jersey