Legal Question in Real Estate Law in New Jersey
underground oil tank removal
We bought a mixed use building 5 years ago. In our original settlement papers, under the area of ''environmental representations,'' the seller said there were no underground oil tanks. We now have our building for sale. The potential buyers home inspector found some old piping coming from a stone basement wall. He suspects an underground tank. Our original settlement papers say:''All of the foregoing representations, covenants and warranties shall survive closing of title. If an underground tank is found, are they liable in any way to help with the costs of removing it? We have very little money. This is a nightmare. Can you advise us on a direction to pursue? Thanks so much, Sincerely, A. A of New Jersey
3 Answers from Attorneys
Re: underground oil tank removal
The reason why the survival clause was included in your contract was to protect you against this situation. Exactly what the seller's obligation is depends on the wording of the clause relating to UST's. It is likely that the seller is responsible for the cost of removal. If there has been a hazardous material discharge, the seller may still be liable for all or part of the cleanup costs. Consult an attorney in your area who handles environmental cleanup matters. If you can't find one, call me.
See also: http://info.corbettlaw.net/lawguru.htm
Re: underground oil tank removal
I'd like to say you are totally protected, but I'd need to see the entire document and review your insurance policy as well before making that type of guarantee. I practice in Southern NJ and would review and advise for a reasonable fee.
Mike
Re: underground oil tank removal
You need to consult with an attorney with experience in environmental matters to advise you. The seller's liability has to be evaluated, and you may have rights and liability also. Obviously, this will be a problem in your pending sale.