Legal Question in Business Law in New York

Written contract necessary?

In a business deal, is it necessary to have both parties sign a contract to make it binding in New York? My husband's boss (owner of company) agreed to pay him a lump sum of money one year from now. Is there any reason a written contract would be safer than a verbal agreement? We are disagreeing on this; my husband says it is not necessary to have the deal in writing. Thank you.


Asked on 7/13/07, 6:07 pm

3 Answers from Attorneys

Johm Smith tom's

Re: Written contract necessary?

Get it in writing and signed by all parties or you will probably regret not doing it later. A year is a long time and a verbal agreement is only valid up to $500 in most cases.

Read more
Answered on 7/13/07, 7:13 pm
Kristen Browde Browde Law, P.C.

Re: Written contract necessary?

The previous answer is incorrect, at least as to New York law - a verbal contract can be binding, even if it involves more than $500 - even though there are conditions under which it might not be binding. The real question is what the contract actually says...why is the contract being made.

However, the sentiment is correct - putting it in writing is certainly a good idea - even if it isn't necessary.

Read more
Answered on 7/13/07, 9:49 pm
Nancy Delain Delain Law Office, PLLC

Re: Written contract necessary?

The Statute of Frauds ("S/F") requires a written agreement for all contracts that will not be performed before 1 year+1 day from the date the contract is made.

Even without the S/F, it's MUCH easier to prove the terms of a contract in the event of breach if it's in writing.

For all practical purposes, I think all three answers you've gotten to this so far say the same thing...

Read more
Answered on 7/14/07, 2:26 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Business Law questions and answers in New York