Legal Question in Family Law in New York

Arrears?/Domestic Partnership/Incarceration/Rights?

My friend is being mandated to child support court, for arrears of 11 years for 2 children, of those 11 years, he was living in a domestic relationship with their mother for 5 years, incarcerated for 5 years and supporting his children via a verbal agreement of $100.00 a week for the last year in a half, mostly money orders, but also cash. The question is can she get the arrears, considering these circumstances, and what type of documentation is needed to prove his case?


Asked on 3/09/01, 12:47 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Jonathan J. Braverman Jonathan J. Braverman, Attorney & Mediator

Re: Arrears?/Domestic Partnership/Incarceration/Rights?

Incarceration is not considered by the court as an excuse for non-payment of child support; rather, it is considered a self-inflicted injury. The child support would still have to be paid.

Your friend would get a credit for all money order payments for which he has a receipt. If the custodial parent admits to the cash payments, then he would also receive credit for those, too.

Hope this helps.

Read more
Answered on 5/18/01, 9:32 pm
Phroska L. McAlister PHROSKA LEAKE McALISTER

Re: Arrears?/Domestic Partnership/Incarceration/Rights?

GENERALLY, ARREARS MUST BE PAID PURSUANT AN EXISTING CHILD SUPPORT COURT ORDER AND ARE NOT SUBJECT TO REDUCTION OR VACATUR, BECAUSE THE COURT IMPOSES THE BURDEN ON THE PAYOR PARENT TO SEEK MODIFICATION OR REDUCTION AT THE TIME THAT PARENT IS UNABLE TO PAY. HOWEVER, AN ARGUMENT COULD BE MADE THAT THE CHILD SUPPORT ORDER ENTERED WAS INVALID AT THE TIME ENTERED, NO INCOME, AT THAT TIME; OR THERE WAS FAILURE OF SERVICE; OR THERE WAS SOME INCAPACITY; THAT THE PAYOR WAS UNABLE TO PETITION THE COURT FOR DOWNWARD MODIFICATION, ETC..

ALTHOUGH, IT IS TRUE THAT INCARCERATION MAY BE DEEMED BY THE COURT AS SELF INFLICTED AND THEREFORE NOT A GOOD CAUSE FOR FAILURE TO PAY; THE LAW IS INCONSISTENT & IRRATIONAL, WHICH CAN BE ARGUED, BECAUSE IN THIS INSTANCE, THERE PRESUMABLY WAS A LACK OF INCOME AND THE INABLITY TO FILE A PETITION FOR MODIFICATION DUE THE INCARCERATION.

Read more
Answered on 5/31/01, 10:55 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody and Adoption questions and answers in New York