Legal Question in Landlord & Tenant Law in New York

Re: Parking lot vandalizing

This is an unfortunate series of events. And that will be the 'legal' question: was this clever crooks or stupid security guards?

This case will be decided by who has the 'burden of proof'. I would apply a 'res ipsa loquitor' analysis to this event. That means the security company should have to show that it was not their fault. If they can't, then you may conclude the security company was at fault and make them pay for the damages.

Depending of the layout of the parking lot (is it enclosed?) I think the security company may lose this case.

You are welcome to discuss this matter with me for no charge at my offices at 42 west 44th street, New York, NY. Please call for an appointment first (646) 591-5786.

Re: Parking lot vandalizing

You may have a case but it's not a slam dunk. The sign is immaterial. The issue is whether the parking lot owners took reasonable precautions to avod vandalism. It boils down to, in this case, how big the parking lot is and is one security guard, barbed wire and a camera enough to protect against this kind of act.

Should you like to discuss this or any other legal matter, you can call my office to schedule an appointment for a consultation or in the alternative, I can be reached for on-phone low-cost legal consultation at 1-800-275-5336 x0233699.

Re: Parking lot vandalizing

A bailment is the delivery of an item of personal property from one party to another with the understanding that the property will be returned to the owner. When your car is parked by a valet, you have created a bailment.

When a motor vehicle is left in a garage or parking lot, the relationship between the garage operator and the vehicle owner may be one of bailment, lease, or license, depending upon the circumstance of each case.

Generally, a bailment is created where the operator of a garage has knowingly and voluntarily assumed control, possession, or custody of the vehicle; if the operator has not done so, there may be merely a license to park or a lease of a parking space. As a bailee for hire, the garage operator is bound to use reasonable care in safekeeping the vehicle.

Some courts reject the bailment analyses in parking lot cases and find that whether the garage owner is liable for damages or not depends on all the circumstances and whether the damage or loss was foreseeable i.e. vehicles have been repeatedly vandalized on prior occasions and no steps have been taken to prevent this from happening.

Parking lot stickers or tickets that limit liability are generally rejected by courts under the theory that there is no true assent to these terms on the back of a ticket on behalf of the customer.

Relating to cars parked and stolen from commercial parking lots, the law of bailment generally applies to these cases. The owner of the car is the bailor, and the owner of the parking lot is the bailee. The parking lot has a duty to exercise care during its custody of the car. If the parking lot does not exercise care and is negligent, the parking lot is liable to the car owner for any damage due to the failure to redeliver the car. The parking lot must prove it exercised care in its custody of the car. This is the background law that would apply in the absence of contract when a person parks his car in a parking lot and the car is stolen or damaged.