Legal Question in Insurance Law in North Carolina

House Burns - Insurer Refuses to pay

Home burned to ground. Replacement cost policy w 125% over ride & bldg cost endorsement. Current builder & adjuster estimates to rebuild exceed coverage by 45%+. Home was purchased 4 years before it burned & increases were passed on based on the Bldg cost endorsement each year. Insure contents I hired the appraiser & limits were set based on replace cost valuation shown in the Uniform Residential Appraisal which represent expert testimony in court. But, the appraisal clearly indicates it was prepared soley to provide the client/lender an estimate of market value and any other use was prohibited. Was the insurer negligent in using the restricted purpose market valuation report to determine actual replacement cost (cost to rebuild)? If so, short of litigation how do I prove the point. The appraisal form used is the standard FannieMae appraisal document. FannieMae's mortgage servicing manual indicates the mortgage servicing agent is to check the policy limits set by the insurer. Does the insurer not have the responsibility to establish the replacement cost?


Asked on 3/04/04, 7:48 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

John Kirby Law Offices of John M. Kirby

Re: House Burns - Insurer Refuses to pay

Holy Smokes. What a complicated question. You definitely need to provide more facts for a reliable answer, and you probably need to consult a lawyer. It is not clear to me the extent to which the Insurer relied on your information and/or your request for a given amount of coverage, and the extent to which the Insurer knew that the Appraisal was not appropriate. Putting aside several factual questions, there are a lot of very complicated doctrines at issue. In particular, there are instances in which the insurer is said to have "waived" a policy provision (or is "estopped" to assert a policy provision), that may help you here. Some cases recognize that the Insurer can be liable for failing to advise the Insured as to the type of policy (or limits) he needs, and some cases indicate that the Insurer has a duty to advise the Insured of the terms of the policy (where the insured mis-understands them). Short of litigation, you could approach your agent and inform him or her that you were relying on them to provide you with adequate coverage, or that they used an improper figure for setting the limits (or the appraisal amount). They may or may not want to offer you anything. They probably have some insurance (probably an E&O policy). My suspicion is that their initial reaction will be that they provided you with the insurance you requested. This is really a complex question, that involves very esoteric issues of insurance law. If you want to pursue your claim beyond that request of the agent, you should consult a lawyer.

Read more
Answered on 3/04/04, 9:00 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Insurance Law questions and answers in North Carolina