Legal Question in Legal Ethics in North Carolina
Court Reporter Responsibilty
Would a family of a murdered victom have legal grounds to sue the courts for not completing the trial transcript, which in turn after four years gives the murderer a grant for a new trial, and removed from death row? This will make the family have to go through the three week trial all over again. This causes unnessesary mental anguish and suffering, since the family already went through this four years ago and the murderer was given the death penalty.
Now because of a court reporter,(whom by the way had be fired once before for not doing her job correctly)that did not complete the transcript this murderer has been removed from death row and given a chance at another trial. How is that fair to the victom or her family?
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Court Reporter Responsibilty
That's a novel issue. There was a similar (or the same) issue in a Gaston County case recently. In short, my "best guess" is that you would not have such a claim. First, there is the "public duty doctrine," which often protects public officials (and maybe employees) from liability to an individual, on the basis that their duties are to the population at large, and not to any individual persons. Second, the actual "contract" for the transcript was not with you, but was with the Defense attorney, and you probably would not be a "third party beneficiary" of the contract. There are also issues of your recoverable damages (lost time from work, mental anguish), which may not be recoverable. My best guess is that you would not have a claim, but it is a good question, and our courts recognize novel claims every day, so it could be worth a shot. Also, there are obviously practical concerns, such as finding an attorney to represent you, and dealing with this anguish on two fronts now (i.e. criminal proceeding against alleged murderer and civil action against court reporter). Best of luck to you; sorry this has happened.