Legal Question in Real Estate Law in North Carolina
Changing Mortgage Contract a year after closing.
My ex-wife purchased a home five years ago and upon reviewing her recordsss I discovered that her Original Mortgage had been INCREASED $100,000.00 a year after the closing. She was sent a package of papers to sign and buried in the pile was an authorization form to increase her sale price by $100,000.00 and stupidly, without realizing it, she and her new husband signed it! The reason for the "adjustment" was the fact that the "Original Contract" was in error by $100,000.00. Since this error was found a year later shouldn't they have had the option to VOID the contract, if they wanted too? With that kind of error, was the contract EVER LEGAL to begin with? Where does "Truth In Lending" enter?
1 Answer from Attorneys
Mortgage Modification Mistake of Fact
Q. My ex-wife purchased a home five years ago and
upon reviewing her records I discovered that her
Original Mortgage had been INCREASED $100,000.00
one year after the closing. She was sent a package
of papers to sign and buried in the pile was an
authorization form to increase her sale price by
$100,000.00 and stupidly, without realizing it,
she and her new husband signed it! The reason for
the "adjustment" was the fact that the "Original
Contract" was in error by $100,000.00. Since this
error was found a year later shouldn't they have
had the option to VOID the contract, if they
wanted too? [YES] With that kind of error, was the
contract EVER LEGAL to begin with? [YES] Where does
"Truth In Lending" enter?
A. I'm not sure what you mean by increase the SALES
PRICE. If you mean the amount owing was increased,
then contracts can be modified on the grounds of
mistake of fact. If your "EX" had not agreed to
the modification, the Mtg. Holder would have had
to file suit and have the court modify the mtg.
Your EX would have had to hire an attorney and be
subjected to legal proceedings and expense. The
mtg. holder would remember and take her actions into
consideration in dealing with her in the future.
As far as Truth in Lending, she would probably
have some cause of action to rescind if there were
errors. Then they would have to come up with
the money to pay off what they owed or lose the
property. They could have negotiated for better
terms of interest, etc. in exchange for consent to
modification.
William W. Fernandez
William W. Fernandez, Attorney at Law
250 Panama Road East