Legal Question in Intellectual Property in Oregon
Rights to photographic images.
My question pertains to the legal "rights" that
the owner of a private residence has to the
photographic images of their home. Do they have to
grant permission before a photo taken of their
home can--name removed--reproduced for publication
in a
magazine or book? What about the owner of a
commercial structure? Finally, what about
governmental buildings?
Thank you ve
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Rights to photographic images.
Generally, publicly available views of buildings can be photographed and the photographs reproduced. The photograph is then a work subject to copyright protection. It is probably you the photographer that has the copyright, not the building owner. It is possible to copyright a building, and that prevents duplication of the building...a quite different thing than a photograph taken from a public street. One caveat...be careful not to imply a sponsorship or association between you the photographer and the building being photographed. That is, if you take a picture of the Sears Tower or World Trade Center, do not imply that Sears or the NY Port Authority endorse the respective pictures or are associated with you in any way.