Legal Question in Criminal Law in Pennsylvania
attepted armed robbery
If a conplaintant states that the defendent had a certain type of firearm and the police seized a different type of firearm.Is that firearm admissable in court as evidence.
3 Answers from Attorneys
Re: attepted armed robbery
The answer truly depends on how the complaint is written and to which charge you are referring. Usually, there is more than one gun charge when someone is arrested for a gun so it depends. Also, what do the bills state? In other words, it realy depends on a lot more information then just the complaint.
Good Luck. Feel free to email or call.
Re: attepted armed robbery
That depends if you have an attorney. If you have an attorney, he will file a motion to exclude the evidence of the gun, or he will address it in his cross-examination of the ballistics expert or the police officer. You should definitely hire counsel for a case as serious as this. If you need to talk about our firm representing you, you can contact me at the office at 267.639.3105, or at [email protected].
Re: attepted armed robbery
It depends on a lot of things. The complainant might not be a firearms expert and just thought it was a different type of firearm. You really do need an attorney for this type of case.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Harassment and disorderly conduct My brother was in an argument with his... Asked 4/05/07, 8:31 am in United States Pennsylvania Criminal Law