Legal Question in Criminal Law in Pennsylvania

What is the standard of proof to prove criminal intent beyond a reasonable doubt? Let�s say someone is charged with illegal downloads (e.g. illegal music, obscene videos) and the only evidence is instant message conversations that may indicate who was using the computer at the time the downloading of the files occurred or viewed. Although the evidence may have probative value and be presumptively admissible in court, would more evidence be needed to show intent beyond a reasonable doubt? Would there be joint constructive possession issues as multiple people had access to the computer and lived on the premises of where the computer was found?

Asked on 6/29/12, 2:33 pm

John Davidson Law Office of John A. Davidson

0 users found helpful

0 attorneys agreed

First the prosecution has to prove on it's face that a crime has been committed. The have to prove who did the crime beyond a reasonable doubt,

It appears to me that you're looking for some technicality to escape conviction. You need to listen to Detective Meldrick. Get yourself help..

{John}

Answered on 6/30/12, 7:04 pm

Keywords

Match Any Match All

Country

State

Area of Law