Legal Question in Medical Malpractice in Pennsylvania

Re: perforiated bowel because of colonoscopy

Harm that results from delay in treatment or improper treatment can indeed be the basis for a claim. However the mere fact that perforation occurred following a colonoscopy doesn't necessarily mean your MD was negligent. There are violations of technique that can increase the probability that a perforation will occur and which can be the basis for a claim the perforation shouldn't have occurred. More importantly is whether the perforation resulted in lasting harm. Generally the perforation should be discovered and treated quickly. Harm that results from delay in treatment or improper treatment can indeed be the basis for a claim.

Re: perforiated bowel because of colonoscopy

It may be a case of malpractice. It depends in part on how the procedure was performed, who performed it and what information you were given about the known risks of possible adverse results. Malpractice cases are very complicated. You should speak to a lawyer who has a lot of experience in this area. We would be happy to discuss the case with you.

Re: perforiated bowel because of colonoscopy

maybe yes, maybe no. Perfortion is a risk of the procedure.

Re: perforiated bowel because of colonoscopy

You should retain a lawyer immediately so that you do not jeopardize any rights.

Re: perforiated bowel because of colonoscopy

I perforiated bowel is a risk of a colonoscopy and is probably mentioned in the consent for the procedure. If there is a delay in responding to the signs and symptoms associated with a perforation, then there may be an actionable claim for negligence.