Legal Question in Business Law in Texas

Verbal Agreements

I said I would sell a car to someone for $3200.00 and did not receive any payment or hear from the individual for 5 days. In the mean time I received another offer. The original person contacted me, he said that if I did not sell the car to him he would sue saying that we had a verbal agreement. Is this true and do I have to sell him the car or is it excluded because of the $500.00 rule you stated in your response.


Asked on 4/19/04, 4:31 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Charles White Charles G. White

Re: Verbal Agreements

The first question is whether he accepted your offer, and if so, whether the deal was made subject to payment within a set period of time (e.g. within the five-day period). If the offer was not accepted, then he had no deal, or if the deal was subject to his paying you within the five-day period, then he has not lived up to the conditions to make a deal. If a deal was made and he has not breached by unreasonably delaying his performance, then he has an enforceable contract, subject to 2-201 of the Uniform Commercial Code. The $500 provision is not a slam-dunk defense. See 2.201(c)(2) below. If you admit in your lawsuit pleadings, in your testimony, or otherwise in a lawsuit that a deal was made, then the $500 provision would not be applicable.

========

� 2.201. Formal Requirements; Statute of Frauds

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $ 500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.

. . .

(c) A contract which does not satisfy the requirements of Subsection (a) but which is valid in other respects is enforceable

. . .

(2) if the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in his pleading, testimony or otherwise in court that a contract for sale was made, but the contract is not enforceable under this provision beyond the quantity of goods admitted; or

(3) with respect to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and accepted (Section 2.606).

Read more
Answered on 4/19/04, 4:57 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Business Law questions and answers in Texas