Legal Question in Business Law in Texas
Verbal Agreements
I said I would sell a car to someone for $3200.00 and did not receive any payment or hear from the individual for 5 days. In the mean time I received another offer. The original person contacted me, he said that if I did not sell the car to him he would sue saying that we had a verbal agreement. Is this true and do I have to sell him the car or is it excluded because of the $500.00 rule you stated in your response.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Verbal Agreements
The first question is whether he accepted your offer, and if so, whether the deal was made subject to payment within a set period of time (e.g. within the five-day period). If the offer was not accepted, then he had no deal, or if the deal was subject to his paying you within the five-day period, then he has not lived up to the conditions to make a deal. If a deal was made and he has not breached by unreasonably delaying his performance, then he has an enforceable contract, subject to 2-201 of the Uniform Commercial Code. The $500 provision is not a slam-dunk defense. See 2.201(c)(2) below. If you admit in your lawsuit pleadings, in your testimony, or otherwise in a lawsuit that a deal was made, then the $500 provision would not be applicable.
========
� 2.201. Formal Requirements; Statute of Frauds
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $ 500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.
. . .
(c) A contract which does not satisfy the requirements of Subsection (a) but which is valid in other respects is enforceable
. . .
(2) if the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in his pleading, testimony or otherwise in court that a contract for sale was made, but the contract is not enforceable under this provision beyond the quantity of goods admitted; or
(3) with respect to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and accepted (Section 2.606).
Related Questions & Answers
-
Company Succession My business is a corporation, I am 51% owner and my wife is 49%... Asked 4/15/04, 12:12 pm in United States Texas Business Law
-
Forming an LLC with a foreign national as one of the partners We are thinking of... Asked 4/15/04, 11:52 am in United States Texas Business Law
-
Is this considered a Kickback? My friend works at at Architecture firm. He heads up... Asked 4/12/04, 5:30 pm in United States Texas Business Law