Legal Question in Criminal Law in Texas
Rules of Evidence and Privileged Conversations
A psychologist's client confesses to a felony (murder or manslaughter) during a therapeutic conversation which would normally be considered privileged. What are the legal (not ethical) obligations of the psychologist regarding informing the authorities of his client's confession and alleged guilt. Would there be any exceptions to the rule depending on the ''counselor''s'' credentials, i.e., would a family therapist who is not a psychologist have different obligations? And last, does the defendent's right not to present evidence against himself enter into this at all?
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Rules of Evidence and Privileged Conversations
This is something which should be discussed in a private consultation with an attorney. Mental health professionals generally have an affirmative duty to disclose prospective crimes.
http://www.reasonable-doubt.com
Related Questions & Answers
-
Felony or offense involving moral turpitude If I am applying for a new teaching... Asked 3/12/03, 7:29 pm in United States Texas Criminal Law
-
Outrageous Bond If one has been indicted on 12 counts of sexual misconduct with six... Asked 2/26/03, 4:13 am in United States Texas Criminal Law
-
Stalking A man was supeened to go to court (has not been arrested) and discuss the... Asked 2/19/03, 4:09 am in United States Texas Criminal Law
-
To marry or not hello,my boyfriend and i are both being charged for the same... Asked 2/17/03, 9:20 pm in United States Texas Criminal Law
-
What happens now? My husband is being charged with aggravated assult w/a deadly... Asked 2/14/03, 11:27 am in United States Texas Criminal Law