Legal Question in Personal Injury in Texas

At-fault driver's insurance refusing to provide rental car

Last week, an individual slammed into the rear of my new car, knocking me onto a curb and into the rear of another vehicle. The individual told the police officers that his brakes went out. His insurance company is extremely slow to respond and refuses to issue a direct bill for me to have a rental car. My car is not drivable and because I have no transportation, I am losing out on contract opportunities to earn money. As it stands right now, it seems as if I am facing a Catch 22 situation. I am being told that I have to pay for a rental car (in addition to paying the car note for my undrivable car and all my other bills), but do not have the extra money to do so because I have no transportation to get to contract assignments. This seems totally unfair to me, but I wanted to find out if that is just the way things work???


Asked on 6/13/02, 12:51 am

2 Answers from Attorneys

Paul Velte IV Paul C. Velte IV, Attorney at Law

Recovering property damages from a liability insurer

You hit the nail on the head, it's pretty much just the way things work. What you're entitled to receive under the law and what you actually receive are often quite different, due, in my opinion, to the fact that insurers know low-damage cases (e.g., property damage only, with no personal injury) will usually not warrant attorney involvement. Few attorneys are going to work the case for 1/3rd of $1700; and even if they did, you would still not be whole, since an attorney's fee is taken out of your recovery. As long as insurers offer you more than 2/3rds of what you would receive if you did have an attorney, then you are better off than if you got an attorney and they paid full price. Either way, you lose because the law does not require insurers to pay your attorney expenses.

Technically, you're entitled to the loss of use of your vehicle which is typically measured by the cost to rent a similar vehicle for the time period it takes to get it repaired. If it's "totaled," though, you get loss of use only for the time it takes to figure out its totaled. In that case, you get the fair market value of the vehicle the instant before it was totaled. If you happen to owe more than that on the car note, you get stuck with the difference. It's not right or fair, just the way it is. I personally think we need a law that says insurers must pay what's owed on a totaled vehicle, at the minimum.

Read more
Answered on 6/13/02, 8:00 pm
John Allen Law Frim of Trey Allen PC

Re: At-fault driver's insurance refusing to provide rental car

It sounds like you are getting the run-around. If the other driver is at fault, and your description indicates he is, you are entitled to compensation in connection with the property damage. The insurance company should appraise the damage, notify you of the appraisal, and seek approval from you for the appraised amount. You are also entitled to compensation for the loss of use of your vehicle while it is being appraised and repaired. This "loss of use" can be in the form of a cash payment to reimburse you for rental car expenses. Or, the insurance company can set you up with a rental car. If yu use your car for work, you may be entitled to further compensation. If you were injured, you are also entitled to receive compensation for medical bills and pain and suffering, as well as lost wages. Various insurance companies handle things differently. Some are more professional than others, and some need to be prodded aggresively. Some insurance companies outright abuse people that are not represented by an attorney, even on property damage. I would be curious to know what company you are dealing with. If you need any more info, feel free to write (email) or call 214 559-6173.

Read more
Answered on 6/13/02, 11:22 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Personal Injury Law and Tort Law questions and answers in Texas