Legal Question in Personal Injury in Texas

Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Landlord's House

My husband and I were subject to carbon monoxide poisoning in our former home. The dates of exposure are from May 2001 - August 2002. We have tried working with two lawyers (one of whom - a contingency based lawyer - sat on our case for 5 months and just dropped it in January 2003 citing that it was a ''waste of time'' and ''not an easy win''). Due to the long-term effects of carbon monoxide poisoning, my husband and I are willing to take on our landlord and property management company ourselves, but would prefer the knowledge of an experiened lawyer. Question - can a contingency lawyer knowingly take on a ''hard to win'' case, send out one letter, not do any other work and then drop the case? Also, do we have access to the files this lawyer currently has?


Asked on 1/18/03, 10:12 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

John Allen Law Frim of Trey Allen PC

Re: Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Landlord's House

You may request the entire file and the attorney has to give it to you. Attorneys take on cases and in the contingency fee business, they evaluate the likelihood of success. Typically, a personal injury attorney evaluates the extent of the injury, the solvency of the defendant, the potential expense in proving the case, and the degree of liabilty. These factors are meshed in an effort to determine if it makes good economic sense, from the attorney's perspective, to proceed. For instance, toxic tort cases are very expensive to litigate. It would not make sense for an attorney to litigate a case if someone is negligently exposed to a toxic chemical, but there is no proof the individual incurred any damages. Exposure is not necessarily enough. In that cases, the end result would be outweighed by the expense of litigation. On the other hand, if someone is exposed and contracts a serious and debilitating illness, but the liability is not crystal clear, the attorney may consider taking the case simply becasue the damages are so larger. In the latter case, the potential reward would outweigh the risks. the best scenario involves serious objective damages, clear cut liability, and a solvent defendant.

In sum, an attorney has the right to take on a case and then later release it if he feels it cannot be proven or he determines the costs outweigh the potential recovery. However, they must release it in time to give the client a chance to proceed further.

Read more
Answered on 1/18/03, 10:35 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Personal Injury Law and Tort Law questions and answers in Texas