Legal Question in Business Law in United Kingdom
Legal advice please
My brother purchased a Limited company in 2004 the purchase agreement was that my brother acquired 100% share capital for a fixed price and the agreed payment terms was to pay off the agreed price over a 3 year period of 6 equal instalments, during this period the vendor invoiced the company that my brother had purchased and the invoices where settled in full by the company, however the company ceased trading in October 2006.the original vendor has now contacted my brother personally and is demanding full settlement of the final remaining instalment. My brother informed him that the company is no longer trading and he is insisting that He pays personally for the remaining instalment, IS He liable?
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Legal advice please
Depending on the circumstances he may liable to the purchaser for the balance and may also be liable to repay to the company the installments for the shares the Company paid, if he is pursued by the liquidator or creditors. This is because Section 151 of The Companies Act prohibits the giving of financial assistance before or at the same time as the acquisition of shares and/or after the acquisition of shares.
There are both civil and criminal penalties for breach of the financial assistance prohibition. Usually The transaction itself is void and unenforceable. However, this may not help a party who has benefitted from the transaction. If a provision for illegal financial assistance is contained in a share purchase agreement, then it may be possible to sever the offending term. If the terms relating to the share purchase can be severed from the terms relating to the illegal financial assistance, then the terms relating to the acquisition can be enforced. If they cannot, then the whole agreement is void.
The criminal sanction for contravention of section 151 renders the company liable to a fine and every officer in default liable to a fine or up to two years' imprisonment or both. A director may also be liable for disqualification as a result of a company's involvement in a prohibited transaction under section 1, Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
It is presumed that the parties didn't have legal advice at the time as if they were not advised that the transaction was illegal by their solicitors this would be surprising. If they didn't take advice then its time to now!!
Related Questions & Answers
-
Breach Of Contract I have two purchase official purchase orders which my client... Asked 5/07/07, 6:08 pm in United Kingdom Business Law
-
Partnership signed contract for new business venture, agreed 50% share for partner... Asked 4/01/07, 6:17 am in United Kingdom Business Law
-
I am owed money I am an IT contractor and my last contract ended 01/09/2006. Lexus... Asked 3/26/07, 12:26 pm in United Kingdom Business Law
-
Division of company shares I am one of three equal directors of a small limousine... Asked 3/19/07, 10:36 am in United Kingdom Business Law
-
Winding up can a american based company be wound up in english courts if it failed... Asked 3/07/07, 12:37 pm in United Kingdom Business Law