Legal Question in Civil Litigation in United States Virgin Islands
Jurisdiction
I live in GA. I inherited a property in the US Virgin Islands. My family has not used the property since before my birth, I am 33. There was a fire on the property and the neighboring property was damaged and the owner of that property is claiming that she was injured on the night of the fire- ''slip and fall.'' I received fines from the Fire Marshall before and after the fire and there were squatters on the property. I've received letters from the attorney representing the neighbor stating that they are going to sue me because my tenants set the fire. The people on the property were not my tenants- they were squatting. I was told that the people squatting on the land were originally tenants and that they stopped paying rent and were never evicted from the property (over years). I've paid over $1500 in fines to the Fire Marshall. My question is Can I in fact be held responsiible for the damage to the neighbors person and property and would there be sufficient jurisdicition for me to be subject to anbswer to a court in the Virgin Islands. The attorney I consulted with told me that jurisdiction was established because I was operating as a landlord to the tenants. There is much more that I'm leaving out but those are the basics.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Jurisdiction
I can only give you general answers because the answers to the questions you raise are very dependent upon the facts.
1. Can you be liable? As a general rule, yes. The owner of a property can be liable to people who are injured by an unreasonably dangerous condition on the property. Since there were fines levied by the fire marshall before the fire, I assume that there are sufficient facts from which a jury could conclude that there was a dangerous condition on the property.
2. Is there jurisdiction? This is more difficult to answer. It depends upon how often you come to the VI, what your contacts were with the VI, the last time you collected rent, etc., etc. The fact that you've paid the fines probably helps support a finding of personal jurisdiction. I doubt that a court would find no personal jurisdiction unless it found that you had abandoned the property at the time of the fire. And since you paid fines, that would suggest that you had not abandoned the property. (If you've paid the property taxes, that also would undermine any claim of abandonment.)
Also, there is another form of jurisdiction called "in rem" jurisdiction that could give them jurisdiction over any property you own here. In that situation, they could get a judgment against you but only enforce the judgment against the property here in the VI. (They could also assert both personal and in rem jurisdiction and try to get the best of both worlds.) There could be other things that affect the analysis, such as how the property is owned (whose name is it in, was the title transferred from the estate, etc.)
Please keep in mind that what I am giving to you is very general information and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship can be formed with me or my law office unless there is a written agreement, signed by both attorney and client, stating that we have agreed to such a relationship.