Legal Question in Personal Injury in Virginia
Automobile Accident - liability
My fiance was driving home on the interstate (4 lanes). He was in the far lane and began to make a lane change. A car came from the other side preventing him from entering into the new lane completely. He never completed the lane change, he had to come back into the lane he was in to prevent an accident. The car behind him (following too close) rear ended him and caused him to begin to lose control of the vehicle. The young man immediately stated that it was his fault. Now he is stating different. His insurance company is saying that my fiance was partially liable, however, as this person rear ended my fiance and he had not gotten out of the lane completely when the car that hit him attempted to move forward, I do not see how he could be partially liable. Not to mention the adjuster came out on a friday around 9 am. The denial letter came in saturdays mail (dated and post marked for the friday the adjuster came out). They seem to have quickly denied this claim. Can this matter be appealed? Can I bring in commissioner of insurance to review. Any suggestions would be helpful - what about this 1 % liability rule?
3 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Automobile Accident - liability
Your fiance may file his claim for damages against the driver who rear ended him in small claims court for less than $40.
However, attorneys for the insurance company will have the case removed to general district court if the insurance company becomes involved.
If such becomes the case, your fiance will most likely require the services of an attorney in order to have any chance of winning his case.
Forget about having the insurance commissioner review the matter. These kinds of cases are usually resolved through litigation(or the threat thereof)rather than by insurance commissioners.
Re: Automobile Accident - liability
P.S. The 1% liability rule is a rule concerning contributory negligence which applies in Virginia and a couple of other jurisdictions.
It simply means that if the trier of fact(the judge or jury)finds that the plaintiff is responsible for 1% or greater of the negligent conduct which was the proximate cause of the accident which resulted in the damages being sued for, the plaintiff is barred from any recovery.
Re: Automobile Accident - liability
Insurance companies LIE. I imagine that they
have a check list of bogus excuses for not
paying what they owe. They hope that you will
be uninformed enough to believe what they say
or will be too discouraged to fight them. So
whatever the truth about your legal situation,
start off by IGNORING whatever the insurance
company said. It is completely worthelss and
tells you absolutely nothing. In fact, at best,
it will only confuse your thinking if you take
their excuse seriously for one moment.
A court will make its own independent evaluation
of the law and the facts, and so should you.
It is basic law that any driver is required to
keep his car under control. As a result, almost
any time your car is hit from behind, the
driver behind is automatically at fault. It is
probably the strongest "automatic" rule in all
of traffic law. If you are hit from behind, it
is the other person's fault.
Insurance companies will frequently try to lie
and say you are partially at fault. Theoretically
Virginia law does say that "contributory
negligence" is a defense. So if you also caused
the accident, you cannot recover.
However, "contributory neglience" must (a) be
negligent, and (b) contribute. If your actions
helped cause the accident BUT WERE NOT WRONGFUL
then those actions ARE NOT "contributory
negligence" and DO NOT excuse the other driver.
In your case, it will be of enormous importance
exactly what happened. However, if your fiancee
made a lane change that was reasonable, and was
surprised by another car that was NOT driving
reasonably, then your fiance acted PROPERLY to
avoid an accident with the first car. So he
was NOT negligent. He acted with care and
prudence in avoiding an accident with the other
car. They will try to say that perhaps it was
negligent to change lanes because it was not
safe to do so. That will be the whole ball game.
If your fiancee should have seen that there was
no room to safely enter the other lane, then he
will probably lose.
Also, it would help his case if he never completely left the original lane. If he was
re-entering the lane, this is more problematic
than if he was only starting to leave the lane
and changed his mind.
The other driver was clearly negligent by
following too closely as well as by
You should see a lawyer to file a lawsuit.
(You sue the other driver, not the insurance
co. They then answer for the driver.) But if
the amount is too small, you may be able to do
it yourself. The other problem you will have
is in proving yrou damages.