Legal Question in Legal Malpractice in Washington
Recourse for lousy lawyer?
I hired a lawyer 19 months ago for a simple probate. His fee was nominal ($600.), I paid him in full, he said it would take around three months. After 17 months, and repeated attempts to contact him, I have had to hire another lawyer. The first lawyer didn't even publish a letter to creditors, even though he claimed to have done so. Do I have any legal grounds for recourse against this first lawyer? His incompetence has cost me a lot of money in delaying the sale of properties and in added legal fees. I have also suffered emotional distress.
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Recourse for lousy lawyer?
Whether or not you have been damaged is a question of fact for a court of law. However, it appears that your attorney has violated the Rules of Professional Responsibility by neglecting an entrusted legal matter. You should report the attorney to your state Bar Association, usually a division of the Supreme Court. The attorney would be disciplined, and possibly even lose his/her license to practice law if your allegations are true.
John Phillips
Phillips Law Firm, Inc.
9521 Montgomery Road
Re: Recourse for lousy lawyer?
I doubt you'll get much for the emotional distress,
but from the facts you gave, I'd estimate you are due
money damages from the lawyer; damages I believe
should be in this amount:
Take the length of time the probate with all its complexity
might have taken if worked on diligently (which in MY opinion
based solely on my experiences in Massachusetts with an
entirely different system of probate procedures, would exceed
a year -- 18 months to 2 years is normal). Then you take the
length of time, total, it actually takes including the calendar
time passed with your replacement attorney, and calculate the
difference. Apply that to the earning capacity of assets which
were not earning anything because of the perpetual imminence of
their sale!
Then add the fee you already paid him, less the difference between
what the second attorney cost you to finish and what he thinks it
would have cost you if he did it all himself, ... you get the idea.
Only ask for the difference between what it cost you and what it
should have cost you.
Good luck. By the way, suing attorneys is an expensive venture in
itself and often they can make it not worthwhile since the other side's
cost of battle runs, usually, lower than yours. It's also hard on anybody
to be involved in litigation.
Stuart Williams
Law Offices of Stuart J. Williams
21 Walter St.