Legal Question in DUI Law in Wisconsin

I was picked up for 2nd offence DUI on March 14, 2010. I went to mandatory court appearence on 4/21/10. I waited and was never called. At the end of the court I told them I was there for my appearence and the prosecutor said that my charge was being turned into a 1st offence DUI due to being over 10 years ago since my 1st. She said that someone was supposed to send me a different court appearence for non-criminal traffic court. I never received anything for this new ticket. I want to know if there is some kind of time limit that they have to send me a ticket and a court date. Also wanted to see if there is anything I can do about showing up to a Mandatory court date, and not being heard


Asked on 4/29/10, 7:51 am

2 Answers from Attorneys

Maury Beaulier612.240.8005 Minnesota Lawyers

The statutes of limitation on criminal charges, even those for a misdemeanor would be a term of years. As a result, there is little you can do to speed up the process and you have no remedy for the unnecessary court appearance.

If you had a Blood Alcohol Content under .20, and you have no prior DWI within the last 10 years, you were charged with a fourth degree offense. This is still serious and carries with it maximum criminal penalties of up to 90 days in jail and a $1000 fine. If convicted any subsequent DWI offense would be much more serious and with four offenses in ten years, you can be charged with a felony. As a result, as strong defense on the first alleged incident can be critical to your future. Different Judges give different sentences. Accordingly, understanding your Judge and knowing how to change Judge's can be an important part of the process.

There is also a civil case that results in the revocation of your driver's license. On a first offense over your lifetime, you may be revoked for 30 to 90 days. This is a separate case even though the challenges are largely the same. In order to challenge your license revocation, you must seek a judicial review by filing a petition within 30 days of the offense. Do not forget this critical time period. All too often people with strong defenses come to me too late to challenge the license revocation. The end result goes well beyond simply having your license revoked. A failure to challenge results in an Implied Consent violation on your record which can also affect employment and may be used to enhance any subsequent DWI offense.

There are also additional consequences to a conviction including skyrocketing insurance rates, plate impoundments and sometimes vehicle forfeitures.

There are many challenges to a DWI. Officers must follow very specific steps as part of the arrest. If any one step is missing, the case may be dismissed.

Even more compelling, on April 30, 2009, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued a decision related computerized source codes of breath testing devices that has added a new facet to the DWI defense attorney's ability to seek a dismissal of DWI charges by suppressing any breath test results.

Other points of a defense anaylsis include:

� Reasonable Suspicion. The officer must have reasonable suspicion to believe a specific crime has been committed in order to stop a person. If that reasonable suspicion is lacking the stop and the ticket may be invalid;

� Probable Cause to arrest and charge. The officer must make sufficient observations to form a basis for probable cause to believe that you were operating a vehicle while intoxicated. Oftentimes, officers perform field sobriety tests incorrectly making the arrest invalid;

� Procedures at the Station. The officer must follow very specific procedures at the station including reading and recording an Implied Consent Advisory that informs you that you have a right to a lawyer. If any of the steps are omitted, the charges may be dismissed;

� Test Procedures. Testing methods to determine blood alcohol concentrations are imperfect at best. Like any scientific method, any test result has a margin of error. If the machinery is not properly maintained and even if it is properly maintained, the test results may vary from true Blood Alcohol Concentration. A sufficient variation may result in a reduce charge or no charge.

For a FREE Consultation call us at 612.240-8005.

Read more
Answered on 5/04/10, 11:19 am
JAY Nixon nixon law offices

If I were you, I would seriously consider not "rocking the boat;" if they don't find you first and charge you, don't remind them by complaining about the wasted appearance date. Sometimes, things can "get lost" in the system and if that happens through no fault of yours, it can sometimes work to your benefit. The WI statute of limitations for most criminal and quasi-criminal charges is six years, so the charges could be resurrected at any time within that period. However, the best think that you can do for yourself is to immediately retain an experienced attorney who routinely works in that county; he may very well have been through a similar scenario earlier with a different client and might therefore be able to give you some guidance. My comments in this online forum are offered for public educational purposes only and are not legal advice, nor do they create any attorney/client relationship between us. However, I may be able to formally represent you if you contact my Racine office and make arrangements to retain me. I also represent clients throughout WI.

Read more
Answered on 5/04/10, 12:28 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Drunk Driving & DUI Law questions and answers in Wisconsin