Legal Question in Traffic Law in Wisconsin
Fault regarding an accident with an unlicensed/uninsured motorist
I was involved in an accident with an unlicensed/uninsured motorist. He was stopped or going very slow at the bottom of a bridge in a 35MPH Zone. I was going the posted speed limit. I was coming to the crest of the bridge and noticed him and slammed on my brakes. I rear-ended him.
My question is:
in the state of WI is he liable for not having a license and shouldn't have been on the road in the 1st place or am I liable because obviously when you rear-end someone it is pretty much your fault. Again he is uninsured as far as the police could tell. He was latino and spoke no english. I received a ticket for following too close and he got one for driving without a license. I am looking for liability... he shouldnt have been driving 1st of all and being uninsured I know I can't get money from him unless I sue if I am in the right.
Any legal advice on this would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You,
Bob(name changed to protect privacy)
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Fault regarding an accident with an unlicensed/uninsured motorist
The WI rules of the road require a driver who is coming over a hillcrest or passing any other obstruction to reduce his or her speed and take other appropriate precautions to avoid possibly unseen objects on the roadway ahead. In other words, if you hit something coming into a "blind" situation, it is pretty much presumed to be your own fault, since you had the duty to proceed with extreme caution. Whether or not an adverse driver was licensed is not relevant in the legal inquiry into who was at fault in any accident. Therefore, the jury would normally not even be told this fact during the liability trial. On the other hand, drivers stopped in the right of way can also be negligent unless they take precautions to warn oncoming drivers, such as puting out road flares, warning lights, etc. Likewise, drivers who stop in traffic for no good reason with traffic behind them (such as a person trying to communicate unhappyness due to being tailgated) are also at fault. Your situation seems to be somewhere between these extremes and therefor will result in a comparitive negligence spit if the case litigated. This means that total 100% of potential fault would be somehow divided between the two drivers by the jury. The adverse driver's punishment for driving without a license would generally be handled by the criminal justice system rather than in civil litigation. His being unlicensed would therefore probably not assist you in achieving your goal of attributing liability to him. Good luck!
Related Questions & Answers
-
Counter-suing for a mva Situation plain and simple: Two years ago I got in a car... Asked 3/03/05, 7:52 pm in United States Wisconsin Traffic Law
-
DL Trouble - suspension & reinstatement I got a DUI in Montana and have... Asked 12/04/04, 11:27 pm in United States Wisconsin Traffic Law
-
Occupational license My question is the following....... If a person holds a... Asked 3/25/04, 11:04 pm in United States Wisconsin Traffic Law
-
Revocation of license Hi My husbands drivers licence was suspended due to failure to... Asked 1/28/04, 11:54 am in United States Wisconsin Traffic Law
-
Can a case be thrown out for the officer using the wrong statute? I was leaving a... Asked 9/30/03, 11:23 am in United States Wisconsin Traffic Law