Legal Question in Medical Malpractice in Pennsylvania

Medical Malpractice

In September 2003 I was injured at work. The workman's comp. carrier has fought me all the way and is still fighting. On August 10 2005 I was sent to a Dr. for an independant medical exam. I was told to bring my Mri plates with me. The plates were place on the edge of a counter and remained there until I was escorted out. The Dr. gave me a topical exam and wrote a report that I was all recovered and should return to work and no further testing is in order. Unknown to him I was scheduled on the 13 of september for a discogram and a Ct. The results of this exam were verified By three other doctors and I have major damage to L3,L4, And L5 and have a slight disability. In my research I have discovered that this IMA doctor does this for a lot of insurance companies. Doesn't this constitute Malpractice?


Asked on 11/21/05, 10:50 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

Arthur Newmark Arthur Newmark, M.D.. Esq

Re: Medical Malpractice

DISCLAIMER:

If you believe that you have a malpractice claim, you should contact an attorney for an in person consultation NOW. I will not be representing you in this claim - This note does not establish an attorney client-relationship.

While it is possible to commit malpractice in the context of an �Independent Medical Examination�, it generally does not apply.

In order to have a Malpractice case, you have to satisfy each of four elements:

1) Duty to treat

2) Breach of the Standard of Care

3) Damages

4) Causation

The �Independent� medical examination doctor is generally a PAID advocate for the person you are opposing. If he reports his findings dishonestly, this may be medically unethical, but, this is different from malpractice.

1) His �duty� to you is questionable as you are NOT seeing him for the purposes of medical advice and treatment. In general, the only way he may be obligated to treat you, is if he learns of a new medical finding in the course of his examination, and doesn�t tell, or if he advises you NOT to get treated. They generally know better than to do this.

2) The �breach of the standard of care� - this may happen all the time - but in the absence of the other three elements, this has no meaning.

3,4) As far as damages are concerned, you did not look to this man for treatment, and in fact appear to be taking the advice of other physicians, so you have not been �medically� damaged by the IME doc. Hopefully, you have not been medically damaged, as you are seeking care elsewhere (as you should).

The damages you describe, if any, are economic, related to a report to a third party that you believe, often with good reason, is fraudulent.

The bottom line, is that IF there is a tort here, it is more in the nature of �fraud� than malpractice. This does not excuse the doctor�s behavior, but it is, with rare exceptions, not the kind of problem a medical malpractice attorney will get involved with.

Read more
Answered on 11/21/05, 12:56 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Medical Malpractice Law questions and answers in Pennsylvania