Legal Question in Disability Law in California

I recently returned to work after being on disability for a bad Lupus flare. I asked my employer if I could work a flexible schedule or reduce my FT hours (40) for a bit until I got my bearings back. He replied with asking me to work a longer day, I believe I am an exempt salaried employee. He then stipulated that I could be switched from a salaried employee to an hourly employee and anything less than 40 hours per week would be reflected in my vacation earnings, insurance etc. Isn't 32 hours still considered full time? Do I not have any rights under the ADA? I am considered having a disability as my disease is severe and it affects my health and quality of living (I think)


Asked on 1/24/11, 4:02 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Michael Kirschbaum Law Offices of Michael R. Kirschbaum

Employers have an obligation to engage in, what we call, an interactive process to understand any limitations an employee's disability may cause and try to reasonably accommodate those limitations to enable the employee to perform the essential functions of their job, unless accommodating the employee causes an undue hardship to the company. It would seem that your boss has not made an attempt to engage in the interactive process. Perhaps you should speak to the human resource manager about this. If not, seek advise from an experienced employment law attorney in your area.

Read more
Answered on 1/27/11, 2:54 pm
Terry A. Nelson Nelson & Lawless

If and when you are denied legally protected leave, or are illegally discriminated or retaliated against because of requesting or taking the leave, or you are refused accommodation, then you can consider legal claims. Your facts seem to indicate a lack of proper accommodation.

An employer is not allowed to 'discriminate' against a legally defined "disability" by any adverse employment action like termination, demotion, harassment, hostile environment, etc. An employer is obligated to provide 'reasonable' accommodation of a disability upon proper notice of valid medical requirements, if accommodation can be done without substantial burden to the company, and accommodation will allow you to still perform all the essential functions of your job. Violation is grounds for a lawsuit. Every case is determined upon its merits and all the facts.

If your CA employer has at least 50 employees, and you are employed for at least 12 months, have at least 1,250 hours worked in the 12 months prior to the leave, then you would be eligible for 12 weeks of unpaid FMLA / CFRA medical leave when you are unable to work [or must care for an immediate family member] because of a �SERIOUS health condition� [that is properly confirmed and documented by the doctor], continuation of group health benefits, restoration to the same or an equivalent job upon return to work, with accrued benefits. The employer can require you to use all accrued unused leave[s] as part of the 12 weeks, so as to make that portion 'paid'. The leave may be taken on reasonable intermittent basis if that need is properly documented by your medical provider. Being out sick with the minor illness or injury does not fall within the protections.

Now, if they violated those rules, contact me for the legal help you'll need. I'll be happy to do so. I've been doing these cases for over 20 years.

Read more
Answered on 1/27/11, 4:26 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Disability Discrimination Law (ADA) questions and answers in California