Legal Question in Business Law in California
The employee handbook says employees will be paid differential pay for vacation and sick days. The company has not been paying this compensation to employees because the employer says a new copy of the employee handbook is in effect. However employees are never given a copy or have signed the new handbook. The company website still has the 2005 handbook active. We have not been paid differential for our days taken. Is this legal? I recently asked the HR person for this handbook and she said it was being revised and has not yet taken effect.
3 Answers from Attorneys
Print out the handbook while you can. Keep good records (at home, please). If and when the job ends, make a claim with the Labor Commissioner or file a lawsuit.
The employer is entitled to set and change hours, duties, titles, compensation, benefits, leaves, vacations, holidays, policies, rules, etc. just not retroactively. Employees have the 'right' to pay and employee benefits per the CA wage and hour laws, and formal company policy as agreed, to be provided a 'safe' workplace to minimize risk of injury, and sometimes are entitled to certain medical/pregnancy leave rights. That's about it. There are no laws against 'unfair treatment' or poor management. In general, unless an employee is civil service, in a union, or has a written employment contract, they are an 'at will' employee that can be disciplined or fired any time for any reason, with or without �cause�, explanation or notice, other than for illegal discrimination, harassment or retaliation under the ADA disability, Civil Rights [age, race, sex, ethnic, religion, pregnancy, etc], Whistle-blower, or similar statutes. The employee's goal should be to keep the employer happy.
Vacation pay can be offered by an employer, but is not required by law. If an employer provides vacation pay, the pay legally belongs to the employee, and the employee's accrued vacation days can never be lost.
With respect to sick pay, you are going to have to look at the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) (29 U.S.C. sect. 2601) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA)( Gov't Code sect. 12945.2 and 19702.3) to determine whether it applies. It is generally applicable to employers of 50 or more employees.
These acts contain overlapping and sometimes conflicting employee rights and employer obligations. Covered employers must provide time off for personal illness, to attend to the illness of a member of the employee's family, and in connection with the birth or adoption of a child. Although that sounds simple, I can tell you that FMLA/ CFRA cases are among the most litigated of all employment law cases and can result in large liabilities.
Related Questions & Answers
-
During mediation process plaintiffs attorney makes verbal agreement to return part... Asked 12/12/10, 9:07 pm in United States California Business Law
-
Hello. I am interested in starting a Non Profit Org. 501(c)3 but organizing the... Asked 12/10/10, 1:12 pm in United States California Business Law
-
I am have a problum with my franchise. There is some issues with the contract.... Asked 12/09/10, 2:30 pm in United States California Business Law
-
If a small business is ran only by two owners is it required to have workman's comp... Asked 12/09/10, 10:24 am in United States California Business Law
-
California LLC with 2 members. I'm buying the other partner out. What documents do... Asked 12/06/10, 8:48 pm in United States California Business Law